Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78092721 |
Registration Number | 2856704 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Jeffrey M. Gitchel |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | WOOD, CAROLINE |
2001-11-12 | Application Filed |
2001-11-27 | Date of First Use |
2002-05-07 | Published for Opposition |
2004-06-22 | Trademark Registered |
2004-07-08 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
2011-01-28 | Cancelled |
2011-01-28 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE LLC |
Address | 100 BAYER ROAD PITTSBURGH DE 15205 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 17 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,005,012,013,035,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0171 | Plastic in rigid and flexible sheets for use in further manufacture |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-02-14 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-02-25 | 2 CNSA P: |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-04-17 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-05-07 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-07-30 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-01-15 | 6 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-02-25 | 7 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2003-02-25 | 8 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2003-02-25 | 9 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-01-15 | 10 EXT1 S: |
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-02-18 | 11 EX1G S: |
EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2003-02-25 | 12 EXT2 S: |
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2003-06-09 | 13 EX2G S: |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2003-02-25 | 14 IUAF S: |
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-02-25 | 15 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-07-28 | 16 GNRT F:First Action |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-08-14 | 17 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2004-01-14 | 18 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-02-02 | 19 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-01-14 | 20 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-02-11 | 21 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-01-15 | 22 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-03-16 | 23 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2004-04-19 | 24 CNPR P: |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-06-22 | 25 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-12-12 | 26 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-12-12 | 27 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2009-04-01 | 28 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2011-01-28 | 29 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.