SUPERDRAIN
DALLMER GMBH & CO.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78071702 |
| Registration Number | 2650895 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | STEWART L. GITLER |
| Attorney Name | Stewart L. Gitler |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGAR |
Timeline
| 2001-06-29 | Application Filed |
| 2002-03-13 | Amend to Register |
| 2002-11-12 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-12-17 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2009-06-20 | Cancelled |
| 2009-06-20 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  DALLMER GMBH & CO. |
| Address | Wiebelsheidestrasse 25 D-59757 Arnsberg DE |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,021,023,031,034 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| B00001 | In the statement, Column 1, line 3, "WEIBLESHEDEIDESTRASSE" should be deleted, and, WIEBELSHEIDESTRASSE should be inserted, and, In the statement, Column 1, line 4, "ARNSBEERG" should be deleted, and, ARNSBERG should be inserted. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-09-06 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-09-13 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-10-05 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-11-15 | 4 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-03-13 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-05-08 | 6 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-07-08 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-07-12 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2002-03-13 | 9 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2002-08-05 | 10 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | 2002-07-08 | 11 1.BD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-08-20 | 12 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2002-08-21 | 13 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2002-11-12 | 14 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | 2003-10-15 | 15 AMD7 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUED | 2003-11-25 | 16 COC. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | 2004-03-25 | 17 AMD7 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2006-06-12 | 18 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-12-17 | 19 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2009-06-20 | 20 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 SUPERDRAIN 78071702 2650895 Dead/Cancelled |
DALLMER GMBH & CO. 2001-06-29 |
 SUPERDRAIN 75982777 2687796 Dead/Cancelled |
DALLMER GMBH & CO. 2001-06-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 