DORSAL
Dorsal Networks, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78063969 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Darren E. Wolf, |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | MANALILI, JOSEPH L |
Timeline
| 2001-05-16 | Application Filed |
| 2002-08-27 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-11-20 | Abandon |
| 2004-10-01 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2004-10-04 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Dorsal Networks, Inc. |
| Address | 7015 Albert Einstein Drive P.O. Box 9400 Columbia DE 210469400 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 37 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Fiber optic telecommunications equipment and systems comprised of such equipment, namely, repeaters, fiber optic light and image conduits, fiber optic cables, power cables, electrical power supplies, computer hardware, optical transmitters, optical receivers, telecommunications switches, multiplexers, repeater housing, and cabinets, shelves and trays that house telecommunications equipment; computer software for use in network management for fiber optic cable networks; element management programs, namely computer software programs that manage the functions and capabilities of telecommunications hardware and software elements in fiber optic cable networks |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-23 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-08-30 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-11-06 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2001-12-18 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2002-05-16 | 5 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-05-16 | 6 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-08-07 | 7 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-08-27 | 8 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-11-19 | 9 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-20 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-05-19 | 11 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-06-17 | 12 EX1G S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-11-20 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2003-12-17 | 14 ABN6 S: |
| LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | 2003-11-20 | 15 LEXT S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-01-20 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2004-01-20 | 17 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | 2004-05-24 | 18 PINM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | 2004-09-28 | 19 PETD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 