NEXPERT
NexPress Solutions, LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78060318 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | DAVID C. STIMSON |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | AMOS, TANYA L |
Timeline
| 2000-11-30 | Date of First Use |
| 2001-04-25 | Application Filed |
| 2003-12-23 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-03-07 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2005-10-20 | Abandon |
| 2005-10-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  NexPress Solutions, LLC |
| Entity Statement | Limited Liability Corporation |
| Address | 1447 St. Paul Street Rochester NY 146537102 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Computer software programs to track, manage, document and illustrate the servicing of digital presses; and computer programs that contain reference databases to illustrate and simplify the manufacture of complex, digitally printed products |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-07 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-08-13 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-02-15 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-02-13 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2002-06-10 | 5 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-11-27 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-11-27 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-01-13 | 8 CNSL S: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-07-24 | 9 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-08-14 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-08-14 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-10-19 | 12 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-12-03 | 13 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-12-23 | 14 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2004-01-22 | 15 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-06-08 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-07-19 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | 2004-08-18 | 18 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2004-10-19 | 19 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2005-02-18 | 20 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2005-02-18 | 21 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2005-02-18 | 22 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2005-02-18 | 23 EX1G S: |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2005-12-27 | 24 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2005-12-27 | 25 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 