PEC
Irad Nv
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78034383 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Domestic Representative | Scott J. Asmus |
| Attorney Name | Scott J. Asmus |
| Attorney Docket Number | IRAD06 |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | CLAYTON, CHERYL A |
Timeline
| 1986-01-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-11-08 | Application Filed |
| 2004-10-30 | Abandon |
| 2005-02-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2005-03-16 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  IRAD NV |
| Address | Technologielaan, 12 B-3001 Leuven BE |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | BE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 38 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0381 | Digital telecommunication services for computer integrated manufacturing (CIM), namely providing transfer of data by telecommunications; Digital telecommunication services, namely telecommunications consultation |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-03-31 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-05-29 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-11-16 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2001-09-17 | 4 CNSL S: |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-10 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-05-19 | 6 CNSI S: |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-11-17 | 7 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-11-28 | 8 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-11-17 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | 2003-11-17 | 10 44DD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-04-09 | 11 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2004-04-30 | 12 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-08-19 | 13 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-08-19 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-09-10 | 15 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2004-10-26 | 16 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2004-10-26 | 17 RECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-11-01 | 18 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-11-17 | 19 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-11-17 | 20 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-11-19 | 21 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2005-02-09 | 22 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-02-09 | 23 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2005-02-14 | 24 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2005-02-14 | 25 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 