To: | Illumina, Inc. (westdocket@holleymenker.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77840648 - MISEQ - 1061.TM1885U |
Sent: | 12/9/2009 3:56:24 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM108@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 77/840648
MARK: MISEQ
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
|
APPLICANT: Illumina, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/9/2009
Telephone Response Encouraged:
Applicant is encouraged to telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney to resolve the issues raised in this Office action.
Search Results
However, in order to pursue registration, applicant must respond to the following.
Clarification of the Identification of Goods
Some of the wording in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the wording fails to indicate specific goods. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In addition, the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because it includes the open-ended wording “including.” See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03(a). The identification must be specific and all-inclusive. Therefore, this wording should be deleted and replaced with “namely.”
Applicant may amend the identification to list only those items that are within the scope of the goods set forth in the application or within the scope of a previously accepted amendment to the identification. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
The examining attorney noted specifically the wording that requires clarification and provided suggestions in bolded italicized font below.
The proposed identification of goods reads:
“Scientific instruments, namely nucleic acid sequencers, imaging devices, and analyzers; equipment for sample preparation, amplification, mixing, hybridization, incubation, and washing, including arrays, flow cells, beads, bead sets; automated laboratory equipment and systems, including sample loaders and barcode readers; computer systems for collecting, storing, analyzing and reporting biological information, and for sample tracking and managing projects, laboratory workflow and data, all the foregoing for use in the fields of scientific, diagnostic and clinical research”
· Applicant must clarify the goods with respect to “imaging devices”
· Applicant must clarify the type of “analyzers”
· “Equipment for sample preparation, amplification, mixing, hybridization, incubation, and washing, including arrays, flow cells, beads, bead sets” must be clarified to articulate the specific equipment applicant is referring to. In addition, applicant must delete the wording “including” and replace it with the word “namely.”
· The wording “sample loaders” is indefinite, and thus, must be clarified to indicate a good properly classified in Class 009. The examining attorney was unable to offer a suggestion because of the indefinite nature of “sample loaders.”
· “Computer systems” must be clarified to specify the components of the system.
The following would be acceptable if adopted by applicant:
“Scientific instruments, namely nucleic acid sequencers, imaging devices, namely {SPECIFY, E.G., nuclear medical research imaging apparatus, electronic imaging apparatus in the field of sclerology, rayid and eyology not for medical use, etc.} and {specify type of analyzers, e.g., flow-based} analyzers for general research uses; equipment for sample preparation, amplification, mixing, hybridization, incubation, and washing, namely {specify, e.g., capillary, protein and receptor micro, etc.} arrays, {specify, e.g., microaspirating, etc.} flow cells, {specify, e.g., magnetic} beads, {specify, e.g., magnetic} bead sets; automated laboratory equipment and systems, namely, barcode readers; computer systems comprised of {specify components of system, e.g., computer hardware, computer operating systems, computer monitors, etc.} for collecting, storing, analyzing and reporting biological information, and for sample tracking and managing projects, laboratory workflow and data, all the foregoing for use in the fields of scientific, diagnostic and clinical research”
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
/cglasser/
Caryn Glasser
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
Phone: (571) 270-1517
Fax: (571) 270-2517
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail. For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney. Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov. When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen. If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.