Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 77829836 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Charles C.H. Wu |
Attorney Docket Number | 1367-0908310 |
Law Office Assigned | M70 |
Employee Name | SNAPP, TINA LOUISE |
2008-06-01 | Date of First Use |
2009-09-18 | Application Filed |
2016-05-24 | Abandon |
2016-06-20 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2016-06-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Elite Screens, Inc. |
Address | 16410 Manning Way Cerritos CA 90703 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
261110 | Rectangles divided once into two sections |
261120 | Rectangles inside one another |
261121 | Rectangles that are completely or partially shaded |
270301 | Geometric figures forming letters, numerals or punctuation |
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | The color(s) black and silver is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2009-09-22 | 1 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2009-09-23 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-12-16 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-12-16 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2009-12-17 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2010-06-02 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-06-02 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-06-03 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2010-06-24 | 9 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2010-06-24 | 10 CNSL S: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-01-11 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2011-01-11 | 12 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2011-07-12 | 13 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-08-08 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2012-01-17 | 15 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2012-07-23 | 16 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2013-01-28 | 17 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2013-08-19 | 18 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2014-03-10 | 19 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2014-09-25 | 20 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2015-04-13 | 21 RCSC S: |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2015-11-02 | 22 RCCK S: |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2015-11-23 | 23 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2015-11-23 | 24 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2016-06-20 | 25 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2016-06-21 | 26 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.