GOLDFIELDS CAFE
Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77750884 |
| Registration Number | 3695963 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Jeremy Patterson |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | VANSTON, KATHLEEN MARY |
Timeline
| 2003-06-25 | Date of First Use |
| 2009-06-03 | Application Filed |
| 2009-07-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2009-10-13 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2009-10-13 | Trademark Registered |
| 2016-05-20 | Cancelled |
| 2016-05-20 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians |
| Entity Statement | federally-recognized indian tribe |
| Address | 46575 Road 417 #A Coarsegold CA US 93614 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 071302 | Advertising, signs, alone; Street signs not attached to a support |
| 071504 | Beams, wood; Lumber; Parquet flooring; Wood boards |
| 140105 | Chain links (not jewelry); Chains, bicycle; Chains, hardware |
| 260513 | Triangles, exactly two triangles; Two triangles |
| 260521 | Triangles that are completely or partially shaded |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 43 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) gray, light brown, maroon, dark brown and black is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2009-06-06 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2009-06-08 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2009-06-09 | 3 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-06-16 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2009-06-18 | 5 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2009-06-18 | 6 GNEA F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2009-06-18 | 7 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2009-06-18 | 8 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-06-18 | 9 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-06-24 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-06-24 | 11 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2009-07-08 | 12 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-07-28 | 13 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-10-13 | 14 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2016-05-20 | 15 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2020-10-21 | 16 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2020-10-28 | 17 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 