Offc Action Outgoing

MAX MUSCLE

MAX ONE NUTRITION, LLC

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           77/567185

 

    MARK: MAX MUSCLE     

 

 

        

*77567185*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          BRUCE B. BRUNDA   

          STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER  

          75 ENTERPRISE STE 250

          ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681  

           

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           JOE WELLS ENTERPRISES, INC.   

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          JWELS-010T        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

THIS IS A FINAL ACTION.

 

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 06/16/2009.

 

The following requirements have been satisfied: identification of services language and disclaimer.  TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.

 

The following requirements are now made FINAL:  Signed and properly verified application.  See37 C.F.R. §2.64(a).

 

FINAL: Signed/Verified Application Required

In the response, applicant submitted that “The filing Attorney has elected not to submit the signed declaration, believing no supporting declaration is required under the Trademark Rules of Practice.” This is not correct. At the time of filing, the application was not signed and verified, both of which are application requirements.  15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1126(d)-(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.33, 2.34(a)(2)-(4).  Therefore, applicant must verify, in a signed affidavit or declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33, the statements specified further below.  15 U.S.C. §§1051(b)(3), 1126(d), (e); 37 C.F.R. §2.33(b)(2), (c); TMEP §§804.02, 806.01(b)-(d).

 

If applicant responds to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), applicant may satisfy this requirement by answering “yes” to the TEAS response form wizard question relating to submitting a “signed declaration,” and properly signing the declaration appearing towards the end of the TEAS response form by either (1) entering in the signature block any combination of letters, numbers, spaces and/or punctuation marks that the filer has adopted as a signature, placed between two forward slash (/) symbols (e.g., /john doe/); (2) e-mailing the completed form from within TEAS to a second party for his/her electronic signature, which will then be automatically returned to the original preparer for submission with the response form; or (3) attaching a jpg or pdf image of a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 (see statements and declaration paragraphs below), together with a pen-and-ink signature.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.33(d), 2.193(c)(1)(iii); TMEP §804.05.  For each method, applicant must either personally sign or manually enter his/her electronic signature and provide the date of “signing.”  TMEP §804.05; see TMEP §804.01(b).  Applicant should also set forth the signatory’s name and position beneath the signature.  See TMEP §§712 et seq., 804.05.

 

If applicant responds to this Office action on paper, via regular mail, applicant may satisfy this requirement by providing the following statements and declaration at the end of the response, personally signed and dated.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.20, 2.33; TMEP §§804.02, 804.05, 806.01(b)-(d).

 

STATEMENTS:  He/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be entitled to use the mark in commerce; that applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application as of the application filing date; that the facts set forth in the application are true and correct; that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.

 

 

DECLARATION:  The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

 

 

Applicant’s Response

 

 

If applicant does not respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action, the application will be abandoned.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).  Applicant may respond to this final Office action by:

 

(1)  Submitting a response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements, if feasible; and/or

 

(2)  Filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with an appeal fee of $100 per class.

 

37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(18), 2.64(a); TBMP ch. 1200; TMEP §714.04.

 

In certain rare circumstances, a petition to the Director may be filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2) to review a final Office action that is limited to procedural issues.  37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §714.04; see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b); TBMP §1201.05; TMEP §1704 (explaining petitionable matters).  The petition fee is $100.  37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).

 

 

 

 

/Anthony M. Rinker/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 102

571-272-5491

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: Applicant should file a response to this Office action online using the form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm, waiting 48-72 hours if applicant received notification of the Office action via e-mail.  For technical assistance with the form, please e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned examining attorney.  Do not respond to this Office action by e-mail; the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed