DREAMSPARK
Microsoft Corporation
Application Filed: 2008-07-10
Trademark Application Details
SECTION 8 & 15-ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77519473 |
| Registration Number | 3820124 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Matthew E. Moersfelder |
| Attorney Docket Number | 25936-T697 |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | THOMAS, AMY E |
Timeline
| 2008-02-18 | Date of First Use |
| 2008-07-10 | Application Filed |
| 2009-12-01 | Published for Opposition |
| 2010-07-20 | Trademark Registered |
| 2016-09-04 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 |
| 2016-09-04 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2019-07-20 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Microsoft Corporation |
| Address | One Microsoft Way Redmond WA 98052 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | WA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | Providing online information concerning the design, development and implementation of software; providing a website that gives students the ability to download computer software in the fields of software, game and website development tools; and providing a website for students to obtain technical support information concerning computer software, computer systems, website and game application development, deployment and management |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-07-14 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2008-07-15 | 2 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-10-17 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-10-21 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-10-21 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-10-21 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2009-04-02 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-04-03 | 8 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-04-02 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-04-03 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2009-04-24 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2009-04-24 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2009-04-24 | 13 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2009-10-20 | 14 EAAU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2009-10-21 | 15 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2009-10-21 | 16 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2009-10-20 | 17 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2009-10-21 | 18 IUAA P: |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-10-20 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-10-21 | 20 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-10-22 | 21 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-10-26 | 22 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-12-01 | 23 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2009-12-01 | 24 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2009-12-30 | 25 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | 2010-06-15 | 26 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2010-07-20 | 27 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2014-10-12 | 28 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2015-07-20 | 29 REM1 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2016-06-28 | 30 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2016-09-04 | 31 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2016-09-04 | 32 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2016-09-04 | 33 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-12-13 | 34 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-12-13 | 35 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2019-07-20 | 36 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2020-10-10 | 37 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2020-10-10 | 38 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2020-10-10 | 39 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2020-10-10 | 40 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2020-10-10 | 41 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2021-02-26 | 42 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 