NERIUM BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.
Nerium Biotechnology, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77393222 |
| Registration Number | 3526064 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | William B. Nash |
| Attorney Docket Number | 46411.03 |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | HODGES, KOURTNEE C |
Timeline
| 2008-02-10 | Application Filed |
| 2008-06-18 | Date of First Use |
| 2008-09-10 | Amend to Register |
| 2008-10-28 | Trademark Registered |
| 2013-04-09 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2015-05-29 | Cancelled |
| 2015-05-29 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Nerium Biotechnology, Inc. |
| Address | Suite 175 11467 Huebner Road San Antonio TX CA 78230 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| B00001 | In the statement, Column 1, line 1," Nerium Biotechnolgy, Inc." should be deleted, and Nerium Biotechnology, Inc. should be inserted. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2008-02-13 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-05-21 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-05-29 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-05-29 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-05-29 | 5 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2008-09-02 | 6 EAAU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2008-09-03 | 7 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2008-09-03 | 8 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2008-09-08 | 9 IUAA P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-09-10 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-09-10 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-09-10 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2008-09-12 | 13 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-09-22 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2008-09-22 | 15 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2008-10-28 | 16 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2010-11-08 | 17 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2010-11-08 | 18 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | 2013-02-21 | 19 ES7R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2013-03-06 | 20 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUED | 2013-03-07 | 21 COC. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2015-05-29 | 22 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 