Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 77291528 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Laura J. Zeman |
Attorney Docket Number | 40795.0100 |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | SPRUILL, DARRYL M |
2007-09-28 | Application Filed |
2010-06-29 | Abandon |
2010-06-29 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2010-07-22 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Express Messenger Systems, Inc. |
Address | 3401 East Harbor Drive Phoenix DE 85034 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
190704 | Cartons, flattened; Flattened packages and cartons; Packages, flattened |
261707 | Heat, lines depicting; Lines depicting speed, propulsion, heat or wind; Propulsion, lines depicting; Speed, lines depicting; Wind, lines depicting |
261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
International Codes: | 39 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,105 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2007-10-03 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2007-10-04 | 2 MDSM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-11-16 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-11-19 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2007-11-20 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-05-20 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-05-20 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-05-21 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-06-01 | 9 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2008-06-02 | 10 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-12-02 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-12-02 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-12-03 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2008-12-22 | 14 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2008-12-23 | 15 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2009-06-23 | 16 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2009-06-23 | 17 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2009-08-25 | 18 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2009-10-15 | 19 CNES R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 2009-10-15 | 20 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2010-04-15 | 21 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2010-06-29 | 22 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-07-21 | 23 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2010-06-29 | 24 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2010-07-23 | 25 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.