Response to Office Action

LAIKA

The MITRE Corporation

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 77280974
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 104
MARK SECTION (no change)
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
DESCRIPTION
electronic health record interoperability testing software system
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
DESCRIPTION
electronic health record interoperability testing software system, namely, computer software for testing the interoperability of electronic health records.
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
TRANSLATION "The foreign wording in the mark translates into English as BARKER."
SIGNIFICANCE OF MARK "LAIKA appearing in the mark has no significance in the relevant trade or industry or as applied to the goods/services listed in the application, no geographical significance, nor any meaning in a foreign language."
SIGNATURE SECTION
DECLARATION SIGNATURE The filing Attorney has elected not to submit the signed declaration, believing no supporting declaration is required under the Trademark Rules of Practice.
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Tracy Durkin/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Tracy-Gene G. Durkin
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of Record
DATE SIGNED 02/14/2008
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Fri Feb 15 13:46:55 EST 2008
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.XXX-
20080215134655774690-7728
0974-4107740b77e5fffb5675
f67d18875f71d4-N/A-N/A-20
080213171741246736



PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 77280974 has been amended as follows:

CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 009 for electronic health record interoperability testing software system
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services as of the filing date of the application. (15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b)).

Proposed: Class 009 for electronic health record interoperability testing software system, namely, computer software for testing the interoperability of electronic health records.
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services as of the filing date of the application. (15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b)).

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Translation
"The foreign wording in the mark translates into English as BARKER."

Significance of wording, letter(s), or numeral(s)
"LAIKA appearing in the mark has no significance in the relevant trade or industry or as applied to the goods/services listed in the application, no geographical significance, nor any meaning in a foreign language."

SIGNATURE(S)
Declaration Signature
I hereby elect to bypass the submission of a signed declaration, because I believe a declaration is not required by the rules of practice. I understand that the examining attorney could still, upon later review, require a signed declaration.
Response Signature
Signature: /Tracy Durkin/     Date: 02/14/2008
Signatory's Name: Tracy-Gene G. Durkin
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the applicant's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the applicant has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the applicant has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the applicant's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 77280974
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Feb 15 13:46:55 EST 2008
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.XXX-200802151346557
74690-77280974-4107740b77e5fffb5675f67d1
8875f71d4-N/A-N/A-20080213171741246736



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed