PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 77194399 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 101 |
MARK SECTION (no change) | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
Applicant submits that it has filed Cancellation Action No. 92048324 against cited Registration No. 985,837 POWERPLAY and that Registrant, as an Affirmative Defense in its Answer, stated in Paragraph 14 that "There is no likelihood of confusion, mistake or deception because, inter alia, Registrant's and Petitioner's marks are not confusingly similar based on the difference in the marks." (Answer attached). Applicant respectfully submits that given Registrant's Answer, there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks and Registrant has, essentially, provided consent to register based on its affirmative statement to this point. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that the Section 2(d) refusal be withdrawn and this application be allowed to proceed to publication. In the alternative, based on Applicant's filing of Cancellation Action No. 92048324 against the cited registration, Applicant requests suspension of this application pending the conclusion of that Cancellation proceeding. |
|
EVIDENCE SECTION | |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_6411518154-190159852_._Answer.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (5 pages) |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT15\771\943\77194399\xml1\ROA0002.JPG |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT15\771\943\77194399\xml1\ROA0003.JPG | |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT15\771\943\77194399\xml1\ROA0004.JPG | |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT15\771\943\77194399\xml1\ROA0005.JPG | |
\\TICRS2\EXPORT15\771\943\77194399\xml1\ROA0006.JPG | |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | Answer of Registrant in Cancellatin Proceeding 92048324 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /RLD/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Renee L. Duff |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record |
DATE SIGNED | 03/11/2008 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Tue Mar 11 19:04:40 EDT 2008 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2 0080311190440792344-77194 399-42014798abd74aab1f593 cee546fd1e4a-N/A-N/A-2008 0311190159852816 |
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009) |
Applicant submits that it has filed Cancellation Action No. 92048324 against cited Registration No. 985,837 POWERPLAY and that Registrant, as an Affirmative Defense in its Answer, stated in Paragraph 14 that "There is no likelihood of confusion, mistake or deception because, inter alia, Registrant's and Petitioner's marks are not confusingly similar based on the difference in the marks." (Answer attached). Applicant respectfully submits that given Registrant's Answer, there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks and Registrant has, essentially, provided consent to register based on its affirmative statement to this point. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that the Section 2(d) refusal be withdrawn and this application be allowed to proceed to publication.
In the alternative, based on Applicant's filing of Cancellation Action No. 92048324 against the cited registration, Applicant requests suspension of this application pending the conclusion of that Cancellation proceeding.