CHINESE LAUNDRY
Goldman, Robert L.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77125633 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | I. Morley Drucker |
| Attorney Docket Number | CELS-76004 |
| Law Office Assigned | M80 |
| Employee Name | LOVELACE, JAMES B |
Timeline
| 2005-11-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2007-03-08 | Application Filed |
| 2007-09-11 | Published for Opposition |
| 2008-12-24 | Abandon |
| 2009-01-19 | Location: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2009-01-19 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Goldman, Robert L. |
| Address | 612 N. Bedford Drive Beverly Hills CA US 90210 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 031524 | Stylized birds |
| 031525 | Blackbirds; Cardinals; Crows; Jays; Other birds not categorized elsewhere; Ravens; Robins; Woodpeckers |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,023,029,030,033,040,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2007-03-12 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2007-03-13 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-06-20 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2007-06-27 | 4 CPEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | 2007-06-27 | 5 CEAP F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-06-27 | 6 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | 2007-06-28 | 7 CEPE I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-07-30 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-08-01 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2007-08-01 | 10 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-08-03 | 11 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-08-06 | 12 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-08-22 | 13 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-09-11 | 14 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2007-12-04 | 15 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2008-06-04 | 16 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2008-06-04 | 17 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2008-06-09 | 18 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2008-06-23 | 19 CNRT W: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2008-06-23 | 20 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-01-19 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-01-21 | 22 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 