SYNTHESYS
Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc.
Application Filed: 2006-12-18
Trademark Application Details
CANCELLED - SECTION 8
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 77066386 |
| Registration Number | 3486963 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Christopher W. Glass |
| Attorney Docket Number | 10886-800US1 |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | RICHARDS, LESLIE L |
Timeline
| 2005-10-21 | Date of First Use |
| 2006-12-18 | Application Filed |
| 2008-06-03 | Published for Opposition |
| 2008-08-19 | Trademark Registered |
| 2014-03-21 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 |
| 2019-03-22 | Cancelled |
| 2019-03-22 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2019-04-30 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc. |
| Address | 730 COOL SPRINGS BLVD., SUITE 110 FRANKLIN DE 37067 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 140101 | Couplings and joints, metal pipe; Pipe couplings and joints; Pipes and fittings; Tubes (hardware); Tubing (hardware) |
| 261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) red and black is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-12-21 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2006-12-22 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-04-11 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-04-18 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-04-18 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2007-11-16 | 6 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2007-11-16 | 7 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2008-01-16 | 8 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2008-01-16 | 9 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-01-16 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-02-15 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-02-15 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-02-15 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-03-12 | 14 CPRA R:Renewal |
| PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-03-12 | 15 GPRA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-03-12 | 16 GPRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2008-04-17 | 17 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-04-17 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-04-17 | 19 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2008-04-17 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2008-04-29 | 21 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2008-04-29 | 22 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2008-04-29 | 23 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2008-04-29 | 24 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2008-04-29 | 25 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2008-05-14 | 26 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2008-06-03 | 27 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2008-08-19 | 28 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2014-02-19 | 29 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2014-02-19 | 30 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2014-03-08 | 31 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 2014-03-12 | 32 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 2014-03-12 | 33 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | 2014-03-21 | 34 EROP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2014-03-21 | 35 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2014-03-21 | 36 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2014-03-21 | 37 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2017-08-19 | 38 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2017-09-08 | 39 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2017-09-08 | 40 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2019-03-22 | 41 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 