Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 77049593 |
Registration Number | 3338096 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | William J. Kananack |
Law Office Assigned | L10 |
Employee Name | WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONN |
1972-12-01 | Date of First Use |
2006-11-22 | Application Filed |
2007-09-04 | Published for Opposition |
2007-11-20 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
2007-11-20 | Trademark Registered |
2014-06-27 | Cancelled |
2014-06-27 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | NIDA CORPORATION |
Address | 300 S. John Rodes Boulevard Melbourne FL 32904 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | FL |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Electronics training devices, namely, computer hardware consoles; printed circuit boards and cards; test instruments in the nature of oscilloscopes, transceivers, function generators, digital and analog multimeters, logic probes, multifunction frequency counters; kits containing component parts in the nature of electric resistors, capacitors, transistors, computer chips, integrated circuits, couplers, connectors, switches, LEDs, diodes, sockets, jumpers, printed circuit boards and cards; prerecorded CD-ROMs and computer courseware, namely, educational software, all for use in instruction in or simulation of digital telecommunications, microwave technology and communications, microprocessor technology, military and commercial aircraft circuitry and electronics, automotive electronics and communications, RF communications, signal processing, fiber optics, power systems, radar circuits, optoelectronics circuits, and circuit construction and bread-boarding |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-11-29 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-03-23 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-03-26 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-03-26 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2007-05-03 | 5 CNEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2007-05-03 | 6 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2007-05-03 | 7 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2007-05-08 | 8 CNEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2007-05-08 | 9 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2007-05-08 | 10 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-05-08 | 11 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-05-24 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-05-24 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-08-15 | 14 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-09-04 | 15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-11-20 | 16 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2014-06-27 | 17 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.