Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 77020927 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Philip Drucker |
Law Office Assigned | L10 |
Employee Name | RHIM, ANDREW |
2006-10-13 | Application Filed |
2008-05-13 | Published for Opposition |
2008-08-05 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
2009-03-09 | Abandon |
2009-03-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 321 South San Vicente Blvd. Suite 404 Los Angeles CA FR 90048 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Legal Entity State | FR |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling mist, styling gel, hair spray, hair sealer and enhancer; non-medicated skin care preparations for moisturizing and exfoliating, facial cleanser, eye makeup remover, skin toning mist, skin moisturizer, eye repair gel, eye cream, eye masks, beauty masks, night cream, lipstick, lip gloss, lip conditioner, lip cream, hand lotion, makeup, lip pencil, compacts for lipstick, lip balm, eye shadow, eye pencil, blush, foundation, pressed face powder, loose face powder, face powder, talcum powder, body powder, bath powder, mascara, eye liner; make-up kits containing lipstick, lip gloss, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, foundation and/or blush |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-10-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-02-28 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-03-01 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-03-01 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-09-04 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-09-04 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-09-08 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-09-27 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-09-27 | 9 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2007-09-27 | 10 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2008-03-25 | 11 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-03-25 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2008-03-25 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2008-03-26 | 14 CNSA P: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-04-07 | 15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2008-04-07 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2008-04-23 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2008-05-13 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2008-08-05 | 19 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2009-03-09 | 20 ABN6 S: |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2009-03-09 | 21 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.