The mark consists of black, white and gray. The color black appears in the letters "S" and "FIA" and white and gray appear in the letter "O" which is in the shape of a pearl.
Mark For: SOFIA™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 77006607 |
Mark Literal Elements | SOFIA |
Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | Service Mark |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2010-02-02 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Victoria Elliot |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | CAPSHAW, DANIEL |
2006-09-25 | Application Filed |
2007-10-00 | Date of First Use |
2007-10-01 | Date of First Use |
2007-10-01 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2010-01-20 | Abandon |
2010-01-20 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
2010-01-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2010-02-02 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 115 SOUTH MACQUESTEN PARKWAY MOUNT VERNON, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 10550 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
![]() | MULTI | 2006-09-25 |
![]() | JPEG | 2006-09-25 |
![]() | XML | 2006-12-18 |
![]() | XML | 2006-12-18 |
![]() | XML | 2007-01-09 |
![]() | MULTI | 2007-02-13 |
![]() | APPLICATION/XML | 2007-03-14 |
![]() | XML | 2007-06-26 |
![]() | MULTI | 2007-12-21 |
![]() | XML | 2008-01-18 |
![]() | MULTI | 2008-01-18 |
![]() | JPEG | 2008-06-26 |
![]() | MULTI | 2008-06-26 |
![]() | MULTI | 2008-07-10 |
![]() | XML | 2008-07-29 |
![]() | XML | 2009-01-06 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-01-07 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-01-26 |
![]() | XML | 2009-05-19 |
![]() | JPEG | 2009-07-26 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-07-26 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-08-13 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-09-03 |
![]() | XML | 2010-02-02 |
27.03.05 | Objects forming letters or numerals |
170301 | Diamonds, jewelry; Nuggets of precious metals; Stones, gems |
270305 | Objects forming letters or numerals |
International Codes: | 35 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | The color(s) black, white and gray is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date |
---|---|
![]() | 2009-05-19 |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2010-02-02 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2010-01-20 | 6607 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2010-01-20 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2009-12-03 | 6607 |
SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | 2009-09-03 | 74887 |
NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2009-09-03 | |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2009-09-03 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-08-12 | 76539 |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-08-12 | 76539 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-08-12 | 76539 |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2009-07-27 | 6607 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2009-07-27 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2009-07-27 | 6607 |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2009-07-26 | |
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2009-05-20 | |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2009-05-19 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2009-05-19 | |
SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | 2009-01-26 | 74887 |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2009-01-26 | |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2009-01-26 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-01-06 | 88889 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2009-01-06 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-01-06 | 88889 |
SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2008-07-29 | 74887 |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-07-29 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-07-29 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-07-10 | 74887 |
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2008-07-09 | 66530 |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2008-06-26 | 66530 |
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2008-06-26 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-01-24 | 76509 |
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2008-01-17 | 64657 |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2007-12-21 | |
EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2007-12-21 | 64657 |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2007-06-26 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-04-03 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-03-14 | |
WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | 2007-03-09 | 61844 |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-02-11 | 67110 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-02-10 | 67110 |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-01-10 | 88889 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-01-10 | |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-01-09 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-01-09 | 88889 |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-12-18 | 76511 |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-12-18 | 6325 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-12-11 | 76511 |
NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2006-09-30 | |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-09-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.