Mark For: BELOVED™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 77004492 |
Mark Literal Elements | BELOVED |
Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
Mark Type | Trademark |
Current Location | TTAB 2010-01-20 |
Basis | 1(b) 44(e) |
Class Status | ABANDONED |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | Yes |
44E Current | Yes |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Dennis M. Moskal, Esq. |
Attorney Docket Number | KUM-1-876-02 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN |
2006-09-21 | Application Filed |
2007-05-24 | Trademark Registered |
2009-07-21 | Published |
2009-07-21 | Published for Opposition |
2010-01-20 | Abandon |
2010-01-20 | Location: TTAB |
2010-01-20 | Status: Abandoned after an inter partes decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Tr |
2010-01-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | Unit 7 85 Royal Crest Court Markham CANADA L3R9X5 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CANADA |
![]() | MULTI | 2006-09-21 |
![]() | JPEG | 2006-09-21 |
![]() | XML | 2007-02-10 |
![]() | MULTI | 2007-03-06 |
![]() | MULTI | 2007-09-06 |
![]() | MULTI | 2007-09-11 |
![]() | XML | 2007-09-29 |
![]() | XML | 2009-06-17 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-06-18 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-06-18 |
![]() | MULTI | 2009-06-18 |
![]() | XML | 2009-07-01 |
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | Hair care products, namely, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, hair gel, hair styling cream, hair wax, hair mousse, hydrogen peroxide, hair bleach, hair color |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2010-01-20 | 191347 |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2010-01-20 | 191347 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2010-01-20 | |
OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2009-08-05 | |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2009-08-05 | 191347 |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-07-21 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2009-07-01 | |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-06-17 | 66213 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-06-17 | |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2009-04-03 | 66213 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-10-01 | 66213 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-10-01 | 66213 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-04-01 | 78289 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-04-01 | 78289 |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2007-09-29 | 82094 |
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2007-09-29 | 6332 |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2007-09-29 | 6332 |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-09-08 | 88889 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-09-06 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-09-06 | 88889 |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-03-06 | 82094 |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-03-06 | 6325 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-02-10 | 82094 |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-09-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.