Mark For: BEST PROGRAM™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 77000387 |
Mark Literal Elements | BEST PROGRAM |
Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
Mark Type | SERVICE MARK |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2008-06-30 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | James L. Brown |
Attorney Docket Number | MED.24-TM |
Law Office Assigned | M70 |
Employee Name | DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL |
2006-09-15 | Application Filed |
2008-06-16 | Abandon |
2008-06-16 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
2008-06-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2008-06-30 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | Medical Simulation Corporation |
Address | 4600 S. Ulster Street Suite 450 Denver, COLORADO UNITED STATES 80237 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
Application | MULTI | 2006-09-15 |
Drawing | JPEG | 2006-09-15 |
Offc Action Outgoing | MULTI | 2007-02-07 |
XSearch Search Summary | XML | 2007-02-07 |
Change of Address | XML | 2007-06-20 |
Response to Office Action | XML | 2007-08-06 |
Amendment and Mail Process Complete | MULTI | 2007-08-08 |
Offc Action Outgoing | MULTI | 2007-08-20 |
Offc Action Outgoing | MULTI | 2007-12-21 |
Notice of Abandonment | XML | 2008-07-01 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: Medical training and teaching services for medical professionals; educational services for medical professionals, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the medical field for healthcare providers
International Codes: | 41 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
D10000 | "PROGRAM" |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-07-01 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2008-06-16 | 387 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-06-16 | 66600 |
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2008-03-31 | 387 |
NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2007-12-21 | |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2007-12-21 | |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2007-12-21 | 70729 |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2007-11-05 | 387 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2007-09-04 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2007-09-04 | 387 |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2007-08-20 | |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-08-20 | 70729 |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-08-20 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-08-07 | 88889 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-08-06 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-08-06 | 88889 |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2007-06-20 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-02-07 | 70729 |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-02-07 | 6325 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-02-07 | 70729 |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-09-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.