Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76977665 |
Registration Number | 2982505 |
Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Andrew B. Mayfield |
Attorney Docket Number | 07815-00245 |
Law Office Assigned | M60 |
Employee Name | SMITH, BRIDGETT G |
1978-00-00 | Date of First Use |
2000-06-02 | Application Filed |
2003-09-23 | Published for Opposition |
2003-12-16 | Trademark Registered |
2007-05-10 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
2010-07-24 | Cancelled |
2010-07-24 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | SPARTECH PLASTICS, LLC |
Address | 1325 ADAMS STREET PORTAGE DE 53901 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 16 |
U.S. Codes: | 002,005,022,023,029,037,038,050 |
International Codes: | 17 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,005,012,013,035,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0161 | plastic film and sheeting for industrial and consumer product packaging and for use in packaging in food, medical, health care, and other industrial and commercial applications; printed decorative paper for lamination to various substrates for use in the manufacture of wall coverings, cabinets, furniture, molding, and trim accents |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-10-27 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-02-28 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-08-27 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-13 | 4 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2003-01-30 | 5 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-13 | 6 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-27 | 7 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-06-19 | 8 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-05-27 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-07-28 | 10 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-09-03 | 11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-09-23 | 12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-12-16 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-11-30 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | 2004-11-30 | 15 AMD7 I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2005-07-06 | 16 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2005-07-19 | 17 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2004-11-30 | 18 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-07-19 | 19 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-10-28 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-10-28 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW CERTIFICATE ISSUED, SEC. 7D | 2007-04-04 | 22 C.7C O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2010-07-24 | 23 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.