UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: July 26, 2019

 

The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

• Sections 1, 2, and 45 Refusal—Failure to Function
• Request for Information
• Mark in Drawing Does Not Match Mark on Specimen

 

SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 45 REFUSAL—FAILURE TO FUNCTION

 

Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, as used on the specimen of record, does not function as a trademark to indicate the source of applicant’s goods and to identify and distinguish them from others.  Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1052, 1127; see In re Phoseon Tech., Inc., 103 USPQ2d 1822, 1827-28 (TTAB 2012); In re Remington Prods., Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1714, 1715 (TTAB 1987); TMEP §§904.07(b); 1202 et seq.

 

Whether a designation functions as a mark depends on the commercial impression it makes on the relevant public; that is, whether purchasers would be likely to regard it as a source-indicator for the goods.  See In re Keep A Breast Found., 123 USPQ2d 1869, 1879 (TTAB 2017) (quoting In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010)); TMEP §1202.  The specimen and any other relevant evidence of use is reviewed to determine whether an applied-for mark is being used as a trademark.  In re Bose Corp., 546 F.2d 893, 897, 192 USPQ 213, 216 (C.C.P.A. 1976); In re Volvo Cars of N. Am., Inc., 46 USPQ2d 1455, 1459 (TTAB 1998). 

 

Not every designation that appears on a product or its packaging functions as a trademark, even though it may have been adopted with the intent to do so.  See In re Peace Love World Live, LLC, 127 USPQ2d 1400, 1404 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Pro-Line Corp., 28 USPQ2d 1141, 1142 (TTAB 1993)).  A designation can only be registered when purchasers would be likely to regard it as a source-indicator for the goods.  See In re Manco, Inc., 24 USPQ2d 1938, 1941 (TTAB 1992) (citing In re Remington Prods. Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1714, 1715 (TTAB 1987)); TMEP §1202.

 

The mark, as shown on the specimen, does not function as a trademark for the class 9 or class 12 goods because it is likely to be viewed by consumers as conveying information about the energy flow of the vehicle. The attached evidence from applicant’s own website and the news media shows that the mark, which is shown in the specimen as a graphic on the vehicle console screen, is used to show consumers “everything you need to know about energy in your Revero,” and the “Revero” is the brand name of applicant’s cars.  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-04/karma-revero-review-this-is-a-very-bad-car-and-here-is-why. Consumers are likely to view the mark as conveying information about the energy flow in their vehicles and not as identifying and distinguishing vehicles or electronic display screens the goods and indicating their source.

 

Further, the applied-for mark does not function as a trademark in class 9 because the specimen shows the mark appearing digitally on an electronic display screen that is inside of a motor vehicle. Indeed, it appears that the screen is a structural part of the motor vehicle or is sold as a part of and attached to the motor vehicle. Nonetheless, consumers are likely to view graphic images appearing on screens in the console of motor vehicles as conveying information about the motor vehicle—not as the source for the display screens separate and apart from the motor vehicle. Therefore, the specimen fails to show use of the mark in commerce in connection with applicant’s class 9 goods.

 

Accordingly, the mark, as shown on the specimen of record, fails to function as a source-indicating trademark.

 

Applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting a substitute specimen for each applicable international class that shows the applied-for mark used in commerce as a trademark for the goods and in the statement of use, and the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing a statement of use.”  37 C.F.R. §2.59(b)(2); TMEP §904.05; see 37 C.F.R. §2.193I(1).  If submitting a substitute specimen requires an amendment to the dates of use, applicant must also verify the amended dates.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §904.05. 

 

Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i).

 

To submit a verified substitute specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, applicant should (1) answer “Yes” to form wizard question #2; and then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, do the following for each relevant class for which a substitute specimen is being submitted:  (2) under “Classification and Listing of Goods/Services/Collective Membership Organization,” select the following statement, “Check here to modify the current classification number; listing of goods/services; dates of use; and/or filing basis; or to submit a substitute specimen or foreign registration certificate.  If not checked, the changes will be ignored.”; (3) under “Specimen File,” attach a specimen (attachment may not exceed 5 megabytes); (4) describe what the specimen consists of; and (5) select the following statement: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application”.  Note:  When submitting a verified substitute specimen, the TEAS online response form requires two signatures:  one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section.

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit additional information about applicant’s specimen.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814. 

 

Applicant must respond to the following questions and/or requests for documentation to satisfy this request for information:  

 

• Describe what the “energy flow” of applicant’s vehicles means.
• What does the graphic shown in the specimen tell users about the vehicle?
• What does the graphic shown in the specimen tell users about the vehicle’s energy?
• Do the wavy lines in the graphic change colors? If so, why do they change colors and what does the change of colors mean?
• Do the wavy lines in the graphic move? If so, why do they move and how do they move? Further, what does it mean when they move?
• What do the diagonal lines—resembling a beam of light—in the graphic mean? Do these lines change color? Do they move? If so, what does the color change or movement mean?
• Does the car in the graphic change colors? If so, what does the change in color mean?
• Does the car in the graphic move? If so, how does it move and what does this movement mean?
• At what point is the graphic shown in the specimen viewable to consumers? Does the car have to be on? Does the car have to be in drive?
• When is the graphic shown in the specimen not viewable to consumers?
• Please show screenshots of the screen or otherwise describe what appears on the screen when the car is off.
• Please show screenshots of the screen or otherwise describe what appears on the screen when the car is first turned on.
• Please show screenshots of the screen or otherwise describe what appears on the screen when the car is in motion.
• Please show screenshots of the screen or otherwise describe what appears on the screen when the electronic screen is not attached to the car.
• Does applicant produce or sell its class 9 goods independent of or not as a structural part of vehicles?

 

See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  

 

Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.  Merely stating that information about the goods or services is available on applicant’s website is an insufficient response and will not make the relevant information of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

MARK IN DRAWING DOES NOT MATCH MARK ON SPECIMEN

 

Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce in International Classes 9 and 12, which is required in the statement of use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).  The mark appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a)-(b); TMEP §807.12(a).

 

In this case, the specimen displays the mark as containing several diagonal lines forming a beam of light from above that feeds into the wavy lines at the bottom of the car.  However, the drawing displays the mark as only showing the wavy lines at the bottom of the car.  The mark on the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because the beam of light does not appear in the drawing.  Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in commerce.  See TMEP §807.12(a).

 

Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods and/or services in the statement of use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use. 

 

Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i).  Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and webpages that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  See TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C).

 

The USPTO will not accept an amended drawing submitted in response to this refusal because the changes would materially alter the drawing of the mark in the original application or as previously acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)-(b); TMEP §807.14.  Specifically, amending the mark would constitute a material alteration because the mark in the specimen gives off a different commercial than the drawing. The specimen gives off the commercial impression that the sun or another light producing body from above is feeding into the wavy lines at the bottom of the car whereas the drawing gives off the commercial impression of a car with a wavy line design towards the bottom of the car.

 

In addition, applicant may not respond by withdrawing the statement of use.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.

 

For more information about drawings and instructions on how to satisfy this response option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.

 

 

ASSISTANCE

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

Robert N. Guliano

/Robert N. Guliano/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

571-272-0174

robert.guliano@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on July 26, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 76719929

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Robert N. Guliano

/Robert N. Guliano/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

571-272-0174

robert.guliano@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from July 26, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”