Filing Receipt Trademark Application

SHARP

SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Filing Receipt Trademark Application




FILING RECEIPT FOR TRADEMARK APPLICATION

May 10, 2011

This acknowledges receipt on the FILING DATE of the application for registration for the mark identified below. The FILING DATE is contingent upon all minimum filing date requirements being met. Your application will be considered in the order in which it was received. Please review the status of your application every six months from the filing date of your application. You can check the status of your application on-line at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/ or by contacting the Trademark Assistance Center at 1-800-786-9199. Also, documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded at http://www.gov.uspto.report/.


	ROBERT W. ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C. 901 N GLEBE RD FL 11 ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853	ATTORNEY REFERENCE NUMBER RWA-790-2246

PLEASE REVIEW THE ACCURACY OF THE FILING RECEIPT DATA.

A request for correction to the filing receipt should be submitted within 30 days. Such requests may be submitted by mail to: COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS, P.O. BOX 1451, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22313-1451; by fax to 571-273-9913; or by e-mail to tmfiling.receipt@uspto.gov. The USPTO will review the request and make corrections when appropriate.



SERIAL NUMBER:	76/707422
FILING DATE:	Apr 27, 2011
REGISTER:	Principal
MARK:	SHARP
MARK TYPE(S):	Trademark
DRAWING TYPE:	Standard Character Mark
FILING BASIS:	Sect. 1(a) (Use in Commerce)

ATTORNEY:

Robert W. Adams

OWNER:

SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA (JAPAN, Corporation), TA SHARP CORPORATION
22-22, Nagaike-cho, Abeno-ku
Osaka 545-8522 , JAPAN

FOR:	Lighting installation using light emitting diodes as a light source, lighting apparatus and installation INT. CLASS: 011 FIRST USE: Aug 30, 2010 USE IN COMMERCE: Aug 30, 2010

ALL OF THE GOODS/SERVICES IN EACH CLASS ARE LISTED

OTHER DATA

OWNER OF U.S. REG. NOS.: 1120410, 1526673, 3781458

Warning: You may receive unsolicited communications from companies requesting fees for trademark related services, such as monitoring and document filing. Although solicitations from these companies frequently display customer-specific information, including USPTO serial number or registration number and owner name, companies who offer these services are not affiliated or associated with the USPTO or any other federal agency. The USPTO does not provide trademark monitoring or any similar services.

For document filing, such companies typically charge a service fee in addition to applicable USPTO fees. You can electronically file directly with the USPTO using forms available through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), accessible via the USPTO website at www.uspto.gov <http://www.gov.uspto.report/>. Only applicable fees required by law, and no service fees, are charged. Status can be monitored directly at no cost through Trademark Application Registration Retrieval (TARR). For general information on filing and maintenance requirements for U.S. trademark applications and registrations, including required fees, please consult the USPTO website.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE PRESENT IN THE USPTO RECORDS

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.