The mark consists of the wording "CIE" and a dove design above the letter "E".
Mark For: CIE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
>Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the wording "CIE" and a dove design above the letter "E".
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76699494 |
Mark Literal Elements | CIE |
Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | INTENT TO USE SECTION 2013-05-08 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | TAYLOR, DAVID T |
2009-09-17 | Application Filed |
2010-12-28 | Published |
2010-12-28 | Published for Opposition |
2013-05-08 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
2013-09-23 | Abandon |
2013-09-23 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
2013-09-23 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | cie boutique inc |
Address | 27 Vineyard Lane Greenwich, CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES 06831 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | NEW YORK |
03.15.25 | Blackbirds; Cardinals; Crows; Jays; Other birds not categorized elsewhere; Ravens; Robins; Woodpeckers |
031519 | Birds in flight or with outspread wings |
031525 | Blackbirds; Cardinals; Crows; Jays; Other birds not categorized elsewhere; Ravens; Robins; Woodpeckers |
(ABANDONED)
IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Vintage clothing for adults and children, namely, dresses, pants, shorts, jackets and tops, sold through boutique stores and through the applicant's website
International Codes: | 25 |
U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-09-23 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-09-23 | 99999 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2013-05-08 | |
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2013-05-08 | 69302 |
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | 2013-05-06 | |
TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | 2013-05-06 | |
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2013-04-30 | |
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2013-04-29 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2013-04-29 | |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2013-04-29 | 88889 |
NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | 2013-04-29 | |
EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | 2013-04-29 | |
EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2013-04-29 | 69302 |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-03-25 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2013-03-25 | 99999 |
EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2013-02-22 | 69302 |
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2012-10-18 | |
EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2012-10-17 | 69302 |
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2012-10-12 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-10-12 | |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2012-10-12 | 88889 |
NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | 2012-10-12 | |
EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | 2012-10-12 | |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-09-24 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-09-24 | 99999 |
EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2012-08-22 | 69302 |
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | 2012-06-08 | |
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2012-06-07 | 69302 |
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2012-06-04 | 69302 |
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2012-05-10 | |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2012-05-10 | 88889 |
NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | 2012-05-10 | |
EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | 2012-05-10 | |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-03-26 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-03-26 | 99999 |
EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2012-02-22 | 69302 |
NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | 2011-08-13 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2011-08-11 | |
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2011-08-11 | 98765 |
EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2011-08-11 | 98765 |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2011-02-22 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2010-12-28 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2010-12-08 | |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2010-11-22 | 68658 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2010-11-22 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-11-01 | 88889 |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2010-10-31 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-10-31 | 88889 |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2010-07-22 | |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2010-07-21 | 76153 |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-07-03 | 68658 |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-07-03 | 68658 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2010-07-03 | 68658 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2010-06-16 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2009-12-18 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-12-17 | 76153 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-12-16 | 76153 |
APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2009-09-25 | |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2009-09-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.