Response to Office Action

CRAVE CASE

White Castle Management Co.

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 76658898
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 113
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)

The examining attorney has required that applicant disclaim the wording “case” from the mark on the basis that the word is merely descriptive.  Applicant respectfully submits that “case” is not merely descriptive as used in the applied-for mark because “case” can have other meanings other than just a “container” and “case”, as used in applicant’s mark, does not merely connote a container.  Further, consumers are not accustomed to hamburger sandwiches coming in cases such that they would automatically associate “case” in applicant’s mark with a container. 

One meaning for “case” is “infatuation”.  Along these lines, a significant amount of applicant’s promotional efforts regarding its hamburgers relate to consumers desiring and yearning for applicant’s burgers.  As a result, consumers regularly go out of their way, at all times of the day and night, seeking out applicant’s restaurants and purchasing its hamburgers.  Therefore, when consumers view the mark CRAVE CASE, they do not merely think that applicant’s hamburgers come in a container, but rather the mark connotes that the consumers have an “infatuation” with the applicant’s hamburgers and/or that the related products are greatly “desired” and “yearned for” by consumers.  Another meaning of “case” is having a circumstance for or a plight for something, like consumers can have a “case” for applicant’s hamburgers.  A copy of the relevant meanings of “case” from www.dictionary.com is attached.  Consumers will not necessarily connote CRAVE CASE with a container, but are more likely to connote CRAVE CASE with having an infatuation with or yearning for applicant’s hamburgers.

Consumers are accustomed to seeing certain products in “cases”.  For instance, beer or soda typically comes in a case.  Hamburgers do not typically come in cases, rather they are generally packaged separately.  Therefore, although “case” may be merely descriptive of beer or soda, it is not merely descriptive of hamburger sandwiches.  In support thereof, the U.S.P.T.O. has not required a disclaimer of the word “case” in registrations for some food and beverage products.  See, COOL CASE for fruit-juice drinks, Reg. No. 2783310; CASE CLOSED for candy and ice cream, Serial No. 78/394452; and DENTS & DINGS BY THE CASE for cooked meat, fruits and other foods, Serial No. 78/673840.  Copies of abstracts of these registrations from the U.S.P.T.O. website are attached. Presumably, the U.S.P.T.O. did not require a disclaimer of “case” in these marks because consumers are not accustomed to seeing the related products in “cases” and the overall connotation of the marks were such that “case” would not be deemed merely descriptive. 

For the foregoing reasons, applicant respectfully requests that the examining attorney withdraw the refusal for a requirement of a disclaimer of “case”. 

EVIDENCE SECTION
        EVIDENCE
        FILE NAME(S)
\\TICRS2\EXPORT12\766\588 \76658898\xml2\ROA0002.JP G
        \\TICRS2\EXPORT12\766\588 \76658898\xml2\ROA0003.JP G
        \\TICRS2\EXPORT12\766\588 \76658898\xml2\ROA0004.JP G
        \\TICRS2\EXPORT12\766\588 \76658898\xml2\ROA0005.JP G
        \\TICRS2\EXPORT12\766\588 \76658898\xml2\ROA0006.JP G
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE Copies of relevant dictionary definitions from www.dictionary.com and abstracts of registrations from the U.S.P.T.O. website.
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Karen Hammond/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Karen Hammond
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of record
DATE SIGNED 03/14/2007
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Wed Mar 14 17:04:47 EDT 2007
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX-
20070314170447276322-7665
8898-3701d547db92c84db3bf
478c9ab8141150-N/A-N/A-20
070314165921066538



PTO Form 1957 (Rev 9/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 04/2009)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:


Application serial no. 76658898 has been amended as follows:
Argument(s)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The examining attorney has required that applicant disclaim the wording “case” from the mark on the basis that the word is merely descriptive.  Applicant respectfully submits that “case” is not merely descriptive as used in the applied-for mark because “case” can have other meanings other than just a “container” and “case”, as used in applicant’s mark, does not merely connote a container.  Further, consumers are not accustomed to hamburger sandwiches coming in cases such that they would automatically associate “case” in applicant’s mark with a container. 

One meaning for “case” is “infatuation”.  Along these lines, a significant amount of applicant’s promotional efforts regarding its hamburgers relate to consumers desiring and yearning for applicant’s burgers.  As a result, consumers regularly go out of their way, at all times of the day and night, seeking out applicant’s restaurants and purchasing its hamburgers.  Therefore, when consumers view the mark CRAVE CASE, they do not merely think that applicant’s hamburgers come in a container, but rather the mark connotes that the consumers have an “infatuation” with the applicant’s hamburgers and/or that the related products are greatly “desired” and “yearned for” by consumers.  Another meaning of “case” is having a circumstance for or a plight for something, like consumers can have a “case” for applicant’s hamburgers.  A copy of the relevant meanings of “case” from www.dictionary.com is attached.  Consumers will not necessarily connote CRAVE CASE with a container, but are more likely to connote CRAVE CASE with having an infatuation with or yearning for applicant’s hamburgers.

Consumers are accustomed to seeing certain products in “cases”.  For instance, beer or soda typically comes in a case.  Hamburgers do not typically come in cases, rather they are generally packaged separately.  Therefore, although “case” may be merely descriptive of beer or soda, it is not merely descriptive of hamburger sandwiches.  In support thereof, the U.S.P.T.O. has not required a disclaimer of the word “case” in registrations for some food and beverage products.  See, COOL CASE for fruit-juice drinks, Reg. No. 2783310; CASE CLOSED for candy and ice cream, Serial No. 78/394452; and DENTS & DINGS BY THE CASE for cooked meat, fruits and other foods, Serial No. 78/673840.  Copies of abstracts of these registrations from the U.S.P.T.O. website are attached. Presumably, the U.S.P.T.O. did not require a disclaimer of “case” in these marks because consumers are not accustomed to seeing the related products in “cases” and the overall connotation of the marks were such that “case” would not be deemed merely descriptive. 

For the foregoing reasons, applicant respectfully requests that the examining attorney withdraw the refusal for a requirement of a disclaimer of “case”. 



Evidence
Evidence in the nature of Copies of relevant dictionary definitions from www.dictionary.com and abstracts of registrations from the U.S.P.T.O. website. has been attached.
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5


Response Signature
Signature: /Karen Hammond/     Date: 03/14/2007
Signatory's Name: Karen Hammond
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is either (1) an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state; or (2) a Canadian attorney/agent who has been granted reciprocal recognition under 37 C.F.R. §10.14(c) by the USPTO's Office of Enrollment and Discipline. He/she further confirms that (1) the applicant has not previously been represented in this matter by an authorized attorney; and (2) he/she is the applicant's attorney or an associate of that attorney.
        
Serial Number: 76658898
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Mar 14 17:04:47 EDT 2007
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX-200703141704472
76322-76658898-3701d547db92c84db3bf478c9
ab8141150-N/A-N/A-20070314165921066538


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed