Mark For: NATALIE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76656180 |
Mark Literal Elements | NATALIE |
Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2007-11-27 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Myron Amer |
Attorney Docket Number | P-4103-1 |
Law Office Assigned | L10 |
Employee Name | GOODSAID, IRA J |
2006-03-07 | Application Filed |
2007-11-26 | Abandon |
2007-11-26 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
2007-11-26 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2007-11-27 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | RP CREATIONS LTD. |
Address | 663 B East Broadway Long Beach, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 11561 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | NEW YORK |
Application | IMAGE/TIFF | 2006-03-07 |
Drawing | IMAGE/TIFF | 2006-03-07 |
Filing Receipt Trademark Application | 2006-03-18 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2006-04-17 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2006-08-24 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2006-08-24 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2006-10-23 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2006-11-14 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2007-04-26 | |
Notice of Abandonment | 2007-11-27 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 026. US 037 039 040 042 050. G & S: Accessories for women, namely, barrettes, buttons, embroidery, hair clips, hat pins and ornamental novelty pins
International Codes: | 26 |
U.S. Codes: | 037,039,040,042,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0261 | Accessories for women, namely, barrettes, buttons, embroidery, hair clips, hat pins and ornamental novelty pins |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-11-27 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-11-26 | 656180 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2007-11-26 | 70458 |
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2007-09-10 | 656180 |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 2007-04-26 | |
EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2007-04-26 | 63030 |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2007-03-05 | 656180 |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2007-03-05 | 656180 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2007-03-02 | |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-11-14 | 63030 |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-11-14 | |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-11-13 | 76538 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-10-23 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-10-23 | 76538 |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-08-25 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-08-24 | 63030 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-08-24 | 63030 |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-04-26 | 68552 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-04-17 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-04-17 | 68552 |
APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2006-03-18 | |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-03-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.