Mark For: BLACK ARMOR™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76639135 |
Mark Literal Elements | BLACK ARMOR |
Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TTAB 2006-07-24 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ABANDONED |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Law Office Assigned | L50 |
Employee Name | BELL, MARLENE D |
2005-05-20 | Application Filed |
2006-02-14 | Published |
2006-02-14 | Published for Opposition |
2006-07-24 | Abandon |
2006-07-24 | Location: TTAB |
2006-07-24 | Status: Abandoned after an inter partes decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Tr |
2006-07-24 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | CARTAGENA, EDWIN |
Address | 735 PELHAM PARKWAY NORTH APT 5L BRONX, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 10467 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Application | 2005-05-20 | |
Drawing | 2005-05-20 | |
Filing Receipt Trademark Application | 2005-06-07 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | IMAGE/TIFF | 2005-06-20 |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2005-09-22 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2005-12-15 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2005-12-19 | |
Examiners Amendment | 2005-12-21 | |
TRAM Snapshot of App at Pub for Oppostn | 2005-12-22 | |
Notice of Publication | APPLICATION/XML | 2006-01-25 |
Notice of Abandonment | APPLICATION/XML | 2006-07-24 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Pull-over shirts, jeans, better-shirts, namely, dress shirts, t-shirts, sweat-suits, caps, headgear, namely, hats
International Codes: | 25 |
U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0251 | Pull-over shirts, jeans, better-shirts, namely, dress shirts, t-shirts, sweat-suits, caps, headgear, namely, hats |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2006-07-24 | 170300 |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2006-07-24 | 170300 |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2006-07-24 | |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2006-07-24 | |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2006-04-11 | 170300 |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2006-03-13 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-02-14 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-01-25 | |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-01-04 | 67215 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2005-12-23 | 67215 |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2005-12-21 | |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2005-12-21 | 76629 |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2005-12-21 | 88888 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-12-21 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-12-20 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-12-19 | 76629 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-12-14 | 76629 |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-10-08 | 69712 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-09-22 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-09-22 | 69712 |
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | 2005-06-23 | 48397 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-06-20 | |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-06-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.