THE MANHATTAN WINDOW CO.
Richloom Corporation
Mark For: THE MANHATTAN WINDOW CO.™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76606953 |
| Mark Literal Elements | THE MANHATTAN WINDOW CO. |
| Mark Drawing Type | 5 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WITH WORD(S) /LETTER(S)/ NUMBER(S) INSTYLIZED FORM |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2006-05-25 |
| Basis | 1(a) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | Yes |
| Current Use | Yes |
| Intent To Use | No |
| Filed ITU | No |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Mark D. Godler |
| Attorney Docket Number | 51300/0002 |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOH |
Timeline
| 2004-04-30 | Date of First Use |
| 2004-04-30 | Date of Use In Commerce |
| 2004-08-11 | Application Filed |
| 2006-04-15 | Abandon |
| 2006-05-25 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-05-25 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
| 2006-05-25 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Richloom Corporation |
| Address | Richloom Drive Ware Shoals, SOUTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES 29692 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | SOUTH CAROLINA |
Documents
 Application | 2004-08-11 | |
| Drawing | 2004-08-11 | |
| Specimen | 2004-08-11 | |
| Filing Receipt Trademark Application | 2004-08-28 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2005-03-15 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2005-03-15 | |
| Response to Office Action | 2005-09-07 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2005-10-14 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | APPLICATION/XML | 2006-05-25 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 024. US 042 050. G & S: Textile fabrics curtains. FIRST USE: 20040430. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20040430
| International Codes: | 24 |
| U.S. Codes: | 042,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "WINDOW COMPANY" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-05-25 | |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-05-25 | |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-10-14 | 74288 |
| CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | 2005-10-14 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-09-13 | 76523 |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-09-07 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-09-07 | 76523 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-03-15 | 74288 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-03-15 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-03-15 | 74288 |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-08-24 |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 THE MANHATTAN WINDOW CO. 76606955 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Richloom Corporation 2004-08-11 |
 THE MANHATTAN WINDOW CO. 76606953 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Richloom Corporation 2004-08-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 