Mark For: WHO'S YOUR DADDY® trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76574442 |
Registration Number | 3315070 |
Mark Literal Elements | WHO'S YOUR DADDY |
Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION 2007-10-23 |
Basis | 1(a) |
Class Status | SECTION 8 - CANCEL |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | Yes |
Current Use | Yes |
Intent To Use | No |
Filed ITU | No |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Robert C. Cogan |
Law Office Assigned | M50 |
Employee Name | BOAGNI, MARY E |
1999-09-15 | Date of First Use |
1999-09-15 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2004-02-09 | Application Filed |
2007-08-07 | Published |
2007-08-07 | Published for Opposition |
2007-10-23 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
2007-10-23 | Trademark Registered |
2014-05-30 | Cancelled |
2014-05-30 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2014-05-30 | Status: Registration cancelled because registrant did not file an acceptable declaration under Section 8. To view all documents in this |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. |
Address | 225 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES 02110 |
Legal Entity Type | Professional Corporation |
Legal Entity State | MASSACHUSETTS |
Party: | FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. |
Entity Statement | PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION |
Address | 225 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON MA 02110 |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | MA |
Application | 2004-02-09 | |
Drawing | 2004-02-09 | |
Specimen | 2004-02-09 | |
Filing Receipt Trademark Application | APPLICATION/XML | 2004-02-27 |
XSearch Search Summary | 2004-08-31 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2004-09-07 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2005-02-15 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2005-04-07 | |
Change of Address | 2005-08-04 | |
TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2005-08-20 | |
Teas Change of Owner Address | 2005-08-20 | |
Response to Office Action | 2005-08-22 | |
Administrative Response | 2005-08-30 | |
Suspension Letter | 2005-09-20 | |
Change of Address | 2005-11-11 | |
Response to Office Action | 2006-07-28 | |
TEAS Withdrawal of Attorney | 2006-12-04 | |
TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2007-03-13 | |
Teas Change of Owner Address | 2007-04-02 | |
TRAM Snapshot of App at Pub for Oppostn | 2007-05-29 | |
Publication & Issue Review Complete | 2007-07-03 | |
Notice of Publication | 2007-07-18 | |
Registration Certificate | 2007-10-23 | |
Change of Address | 2010-03-17 | |
NOS Notice of Suit Incoming | 2010-08-27 |
(CANCELLED)
IC 014. US 002 027 028 050. G & S: Jewelry and watches. FIRST USE: 19990915. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19990915
International Codes: | 14 |
U.S. Codes: | 002,027,028,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0141 | Jewelry and watches |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2014-05-30 | |
NOTICE OF SUIT | 2010-08-27 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2010-03-17 | |
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2010-01-28 | |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2008-11-05 | |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-10-23 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-08-07 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-07-18 | |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-07-02 | 73797 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-07-02 | 73797 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-05-26 | |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2007-05-02 | 574442 |
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2007-04-02 | |
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2007-04-02 | 88888 |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-03-13 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-03-13 | |
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | 2006-12-04 | |
TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | 2006-12-04 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-08-17 | 71441 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-07-28 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-07-28 | 71441 |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-11-11 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2005-10-26 | 574442 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2005-10-20 | |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2005-09-20 | 75601 |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2005-09-20 | 6332 |
LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | 2005-09-08 | |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-08-31 | 76537 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-08-22 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-08-22 | 76537 |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-08-20 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2005-08-20 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-08-20 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-08-04 | |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2005-04-11 | |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-04-07 | 75601 |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-03-10 | 76869 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-02-15 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-02-15 | 76869 |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2004-09-08 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2004-09-07 | 75601 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-08-31 | 75601 |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-02-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.