AIRFRAME
Roux Laboratories, Inc.
Mark For: AIRFRAME™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76516604 |
| Mark Literal Elements | AIRFRAME |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | TTAB 2005-03-09 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ABANDONED |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Domestic Representative | Patrick J. Jennings |
| Attorney Name | Patrick J. Jennings |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | CAPSHAW, DANIEL |
Timeline
| 2003-05-23 | Application Filed |
| 2004-03-23 | Published |
| 2004-03-23 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-03-09 | Abandon |
| 2005-03-09 | Location: TTAB |
| 2005-03-09 | Status: Abandoned after an inter partes decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Tr |
| 2005-03-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Roux Laboratories, Inc. |
| Address | 5344 Overmyer Drive Jacksonville, FLORIDA UNITED STATES 32254 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NEW YORK |
Documents
 Application | 2003-05-23 | |
| Drawing | 2003-05-23 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2003-11-24 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2003-11-24 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2003-11-24 | |
| Response to Office Action | APPLICATION/XML | 2003-12-16 |
| Notice of Publication | 2004-03-03 | |
| Notice of Allowance | APPLICATION/XML | 2004-06-04 |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2005-03-10 | |
| TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2006-04-21 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 003. US 001 004 006 050 051 052. G & S: Hair styling preparations.
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Hair styling preparations. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-04-21 | |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-04-21 | |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-03-10 | |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2005-03-09 | 161651 |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2005-03-09 | 161651 |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-03-09 | |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2004-08-09 | 161651 |
| NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | 2004-08-06 | |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2004-06-15 | |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2004-04-13 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2004-03-23 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2004-03-03 | |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-01-16 | |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2003-12-16 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-12-16 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-11-24 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-11-24 | 74887 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 