To: | Nations Signature Closers, Inc. (kmcley@nationsholding.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76486163 - NSC - N/A |
Sent: | 7/15/03 11:22:55 AM |
Sent As: | ECom110 |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/486163
APPLICANT: Nations Signature Closers, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: KURT MCLEY LIKENS & BLOMQUIST, P.A. 5370 W. 95TH ST. PRAIRIE VILLAGE KS 66207
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom110@uspto.gov
|
MARK: NSC
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: kmcley@nationsholding.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/486163
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
No Conflicting Marks
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Prior Pending Application
The examining attorney encloses information regarding pending Application Serial No. 76415803. The filing date of the referenced application precedes the applicant's filing date. There may be a likelihood of confusion between the two marks under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). If the referenced application matures into a registration, the examining attorney may refuse registration in this case under Section 2(d). 37 C.F.R. Section 2.83; TMEP section 1208.01.
If the applicant believes that there is no potential conflict between this application and the earlier-filed application, the applicant may present arguments relevant to the issue. The election to file or not to file such a request at this time in no way limits the applicant's right to address this issue at a later point.
The drawing is unacceptable because it contains gray matter. A substitute is required. The requirements for a special‑form drawing are as follows.
(1) The drawing must appear in black and white; no color is permitted.
(2) Every line and letter must be black and clear.
(3) The use of gray to indicate shading is unacceptable.
(4) The lining must not be too fine or too close together.
(5) The preferred size of the area in which the mark is displayed is 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) high and 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) wide. It should not be larger than 4 inches (10.3 cm.) high or 4 inches (10.3 cm.) wide.
(6) If the reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, the applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.
37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a). The Office will enforce these drawing requirements strictly.
The Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of smooth, nonshiny, white paper 8 to 8½ inches (20.3 to 21.6 cm.) wide and 11 inches (27.9 cm.) long, and that the sheet contain a heading listing, on separate lines, the applicant’s complete name; the applicant’s address; the goods or services recited in the application; and, if the application is filed under Section 1(a) of the Act, the dates of first use of the mark and of first use of the mark in commerce; or, if the application is filed under Section 44(d), the priority filing date of the foreign application. 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b); TMEP §§807.01(a), 807.01(b), 807.01(c) and 807.07(a).
The recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant may amend the identification as follows.
The wording “Real estate loan signature gatherers and closers” is indefinite. Specifically, “signature gatherers and closers” must be defined further. The applicant may state “Class 36—real estate closing services; providing loans for real estate.”
The wording “This mark has been used for internet website, letterhead, envelopes, business cards, brochures, various other marketing and advertising items” appears to be methods of use rather than descriptions of actual goods and services in trade. Thus this wording must be deleted.
For the applicant's convenience, the Trademark Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual on the internet at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/ offers a searchable list of acceptable identifications and classifications. When formulating and classifying identifications the Manual is a useful resource and guide, but it is not an exhaustive list of every acceptable identification.
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(b); TMEP section 804.09. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of the services recited in the present identification.
An application based on use of the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a), must include a specimen showing use of the mark in commerce on or in connection with the services. TMEP §904. The application does not contain a specimen. The applicant must submit a specimen, and must submit the following statement:
The specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.
This statement must be verified with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.09. The following is a properly worded declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. At the end of the response, the applicant should insert the declaration signed by a person authorized to sign under 37 C.F.R. §2.33(a).
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that the facts set forth in this application are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
The applicant has provided a description of a specimen. However, the description describes the drawing of the mark rather than a specimen actually used in commerce. Examples of acceptable specimens are signs, photographs, brochures or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services. TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Daniel Capshaw/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 110
703-308-9110 ext. 241
ecom110@uspto.gov (formal responses only)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.