Mark For: ONE LOVE® trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76474478 |
Registration Number | 2766686 |
Mark Literal Elements | ONE LOVE |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Affidavit Text | SECT 15. PARTIAL SECT 8 (6-YR). |
Current Location | Not Found 2009-10-07 |
Basis | 1(a) |
Class Status | SECTION 8 - CANCEL |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | Yes |
Current Use | Yes |
Intent To Use | No |
Filed ITU | No |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Ivo Austin |
Law Office Assigned | M40 |
Employee Name | STOKOLS, GWEN P |
1993-08-00 | Date of First Use |
1993-08-01 | Date of First Use |
1993-08-01 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2002-12-11 | Application Filed |
2003-07-01 | Published |
2003-07-01 | Published for Opposition |
2003-09-23 | Trademark Registered |
2009-10-07 | Location: |
2009-10-07 | Location: Not Found |
2014-04-25 | Cancelled |
2014-04-25 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2014-04-25 | Status: Registration cancelled because registrant did not file an acceptable declaration under Section 8. To view all documents in this |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | Teh-Pari International, Inc. |
Address | Post Office Box 268 Graton, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 95444 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CALIFORNIA |
Application | 2002-12-11 | |
Drawing | 2002-12-11 | |
Specimen | 2002-12-11 | |
XSearch Search Summary | IMAGE/TIFF | 2003-05-02 |
Notice of Publication | APPLICATION/XML | 2003-06-11 |
Registration Certificate | IMAGE/TIFF | 2003-09-23 |
Change of Address | 2004-04-02 | |
Section 8 and 15 | 2009-09-22 | |
Specimen | 2009-09-22 | |
Notice of Acceptance Acknowledgement | APPLICATION/XML | 2009-10-07 |
TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2011-04-26 |
(CANCELLED)
IC 003. US 001 004 006 050 051 052. G & S: Perfume oils, perfume solids and incense. FIRST USE: 19930800. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19930800(CANCELLED)
IC 004. US 001 006 015. G & S: [ Candles ]. FIRST USE: 20021000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20021000
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
International Codes: | 4 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,006,015 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | Perfume oils, perfume solids and incense |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2014-04-25 | 76293 |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2011-04-26 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2011-04-26 | |
REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2009-10-07 | 76293 |
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2009-10-06 | 76293 |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2009-09-22 | |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2009-09-22 | 76293 |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-04-02 | |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-09-23 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-07-01 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-06-11 | |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-05-03 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-04-25 | 76936 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.