Mark For: LITTLE CHEF™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 76426954 |
Mark Literal Elements | LITTLE CHEF |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - MANAGING ATTORNEY 2005-05-20 |
Basis | 1(a) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | Yes |
Current Use | Yes |
Intent To Use | No |
Filed ITU | No |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Angela M. Fifelski |
Attorney Docket Number | T00806-US-0 |
Law Office Assigned | M20 |
Employee Name | TAYLOR, CRAIG D |
1956-03-00 | Date of First Use |
1956-03-01 | Date of First Use |
1956-03-01 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2002-07-02 | Application Filed |
2005-05-10 | Abandon |
2005-05-10 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
2005-05-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2005-05-20 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - MANAGING ATTORNEY |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 90 West Morgan Street Austin, INDIANA UNITED STATES 47102 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | INDIANA |
![]() | 2002-07-02 | |
![]() | 2002-07-02 | |
![]() | 2002-07-02 | |
![]() | 2002-07-02 | |
![]() | 2002-07-02 | |
![]() | 2002-11-01 | |
![]() | 2002-11-12 | |
![]() | 2003-05-14 | |
![]() | 2003-05-14 | |
![]() | 2003-06-04 | |
![]() | 2003-06-19 | |
![]() | 2003-12-12 | |
![]() | 2003-12-16 | |
![]() | 2004-04-15 | |
![]() | 2004-04-15 | |
![]() | 2004-06-18 | |
![]() | 2004-06-18 | |
![]() | 2004-06-24 | |
![]() | 2005-02-02 | |
![]() | APPLICATION/XML | 2005-05-20 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 029. US 046. G & S: processed vegetables, soup, and soup mixes. FIRST USE: 19560300. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19560300
International Codes: | 29 |
U.S. Codes: | 046 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0291 | processed vegetables, soup, and soup mixes |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2005-05-20 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2005-05-10 | 426954 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2005-05-10 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2005-02-11 | |
CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2005-02-02 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-02-02 | 61751 |
ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | 2005-02-02 | 61751 |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-12-01 | 70997 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-06-24 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2004-06-24 | 426954 |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-06-24 | 70997 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2004-06-23 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-06-18 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-06-18 | 76538 |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-06-18 | 76538 |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-04-21 | |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2003-12-16 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-12-12 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-14 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-05-12 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-11-12 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-01 | 67433 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.