Mark For: MAKESENSE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76423172 |
Mark Literal Elements | MAKESENSE |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2005-01-23 |
Basis | 1(a) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | Yes |
Current Use | Yes |
Intent To Use | No |
Filed ITU | No |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Kimberly Kepler |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | FROMM, MARTHA L |
2001-04-28 | Date of First Use |
2001-04-28 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2002-06-19 | Application Filed |
2004-12-16 | Abandon |
2005-01-23 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2005-01-23 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
2005-01-23 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | SGII, Inc. |
Address | 4000 Birch Street, Suite 112 Newport Beach, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92660 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
Application | 2002-06-19 | |
Drawing | 2002-06-19 | |
Specimen | 2002-06-19 | |
Suspension Letter | 2002-12-03 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2002-12-03 | |
Change of Address | IMAGE/TIFF | 2003-02-11 |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2003-09-20 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2004-03-25 | |
Duplicate Application | 2004-04-08 | |
Duplicate Drawing | 2004-04-08 | |
File Jacket | 2004-04-08 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2004-04-08 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2004-04-08 | |
Response to Office Action | 2004-04-08 | |
Specimen | 2004-04-08 | |
Unclassified-Other | 2004-04-08 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2004-04-08 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2004-06-14 | |
Notice of Abandonment | 2005-01-24 | |
TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2018-06-07 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 003. US 001 004 006 050 051 052. G & S: Cosmetics, namely, foundations, highlighters, and concealers. FIRST USE: 20010428. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010428
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | Cosmetics, namely, foundations, highlighters, and concealers |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-06-07 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-06-07 | |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-01-24 | |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-01-23 | |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2004-06-15 | |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-04-15 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-03-25 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-03-25 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-03-22 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-09-22 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-02-11 | |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-12-04 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-12-03 | 74676 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-27 | 74674 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-22 | 76936 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.