TRINOX

Bonide Products, Inc.

Application Filed: 2002-03-25

Trademark Application Details

Mark For: TRINOX™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of herbicides for residential and commercial use. [all]

Status

2022-07-29 UTC

DEAD UNKNOWN

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	76386691
Mark Literal Elements	TRINOX
Mark Drawing Type	1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S)
Mark Type	TRADEMARK
Standard Character Claim	No
Register	PRINCIPAL
Current Location	FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 2002-12-31
Basis	1(a)
Class Status	ACTIVE
Primary US Classes	006: Chemicals and Chemical Compositions 018: Medicines and Pharmaceutical Preparations 044: Dental, Medical and Surgical Appliances 046: Foods and Ingredients of Foods 051: Cosmetics and Toilet Preparations 052: Detergents and Soaps
Primary International Class	005 - Primary Class (Pharmaceuticals) Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides.
Filed Use	Yes
Current Use	Yes
Intent To Use	No
Filed ITU	No
44D Filed	No
44E Current	No
66A Current	No
Current Basis	No
No Basis	No
Attorney Name	Nicholas Mesiti, Esq.
Attorney Docket Number	1332.029
Law Office Assigned	M60
Employee Name	FRENCH, CURTIS W

Timeline

2002-02-01	Date of First Use
2002-02-01	Date of Use In Commerce
2002-03-25	Application Filed
2002-12-05	Abandon
2002-12-27	Status: Abandoned because the applicant filed an express abandonment. To view all documents in this file, click on the Trademark Documen
2002-12-27	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2002-12-31	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)

Party:	Bonide Products, Inc.
Address	6301 Sutliff Road Oriskany, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 13424
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	NEW YORK

Documents

Application	IMAGE/TIFF	2002-03-25
Drawing	IMAGE/TIFF	2002-03-25
Specimen		2002-03-25
Paper Correspondence Incoming		2002-12-05
Notice of Abandonment	APPLICATION/XML	2002-12-27

Attorney of Record

NICHOLAS MESITI, ESQ.
HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.
5 COLUMBIA CIRCLE
ALBANY, NEW YORK 12203

Good, Services, and Codes

(ABANDONED)
IC 005. US 006 018 044 046 051 052. G & S: Herbicides for residential and commercial use. FIRST USE: 20020201. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20020201

International Codes:	5
U.S. Codes:	006,018,044,046,051,052

Type Code	Type
GS0051	Herbicides for residential and commercial use

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Proceeding Number
ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	2002-12-27
PAPER RECEIVED	2002-12-05
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2002-12-05
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2002-10-16	76419
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	2002-07-25
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2002-07-18	78190

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
TRINOX 86327907 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Trijicon, Inc. 2014-07-03
TRINOX 76386691 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Bonide Products, Inc. 2002-03-25
TRINOX 76245453 2705261 Dead/Cancelled	Triumph Associates America Inc. 2001-04-23
TRINOX 72159014 0770752 Dead/Expired	PALL CORPORATION 1962-12-12

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.