Mark For: GARDEN HARVEST™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 76373265 |
Mark Literal Elements | GARDEN HARVEST |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2005-01-09 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Kimberly A. Chasteen |
Attorney Docket Number | 028547.0017 |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | JOYNER, CHARLES G |
2002-02-20 | Application Filed |
2004-10-27 | Abandon |
2004-10-27 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
2004-10-27 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2005-01-09 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 2000 W. Broad Street Richmond, VIRGINIA UNITED STATES 23220 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-02-20 |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-02-20 |
![]() | 2002-02-20 | |
![]() | 2002-02-20 | |
![]() | 2002-05-17 | |
![]() | 2002-05-20 | |
![]() | 2002-10-29 | |
![]() | 2002-10-29 | |
![]() | 2002-11-19 | |
![]() | 2002-11-27 | |
![]() | 2003-05-29 | |
![]() | 2003-07-28 | |
![]() | 2003-08-12 | |
![]() | 2003-08-12 | |
![]() | 2003-08-14 | |
![]() | 2003-11-05 | |
![]() | 2004-04-26 | |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2004-06-23 |
![]() | 2004-09-21 | |
![]() | 2004-09-21 | |
![]() | 2005-01-04 | |
![]() | 2005-01-10 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 029. US 046. G & S: freeze dried vegetables(ABANDONED)
IC 030. US 046. G & S: freeze dried herbs
International Codes: | 29 |
U.S. Codes: | 046 |
International Codes: | 30 |
U.S. Codes: | 046 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0291 | freeze dried vegetables |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2005-01-10 | |
PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | 2005-01-09 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-01-04 | |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2004-12-22 | 373265 |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2004-10-27 | 66600 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-09-21 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2004-09-21 | 373265 |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-06-23 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-04-26 | |
CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2004-04-26 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-11-05 | 76845 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-08-26 | 65722 |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-08-18 | |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2003-08-12 | |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2003-06-11 | 373265 |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2003-06-05 | |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2002-11-27 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-26 | 76722 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-10-29 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-10-29 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-05-20 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-05-17 | 78195 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.