EVERYDAY FOOD
MSO IP Holdings, Inc.
Mark For: EVERYDAY FOOD™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76323340 |
| Mark Literal Elements | EVERYDAY FOOD |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 2004-05-20 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Howard J. Shire |
| Attorney Docket Number | 11958/336 3/ |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | OH, WON TEAK |
Timeline
| 2001-10-09 | Application Filed |
| 2003-11-06 | Abandon |
| 2003-11-06 | Status: Abandoned after an appeal of the examining attorney's final refusal. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial |
| 2003-11-06 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2004-05-20 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  MSO IP Holdings, Inc. |
| Address | 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 90025 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CALIFORNIA |
Documents
 Application | IMAGE/TIFF | 2001-10-09 |
| Drawing | IMAGE/TIFF | 2001-10-09 |
 Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2002-06-13 | |
| Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2003-01-10 | |
| Reconsideration Letter | 2003-02-20 | |
| Remand Letter | 2003-05-26 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2004-05-19 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 029. US 046. G & S: FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, JELLIES, JAMS, FRUIT SAUCES, EGGS, FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES, SOUP MIXES, PRE-CUT VEGETABLE SALADS, OLIVE OIL, CANNED, COOKED OR OTHERWISE PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
| International Codes: | 29 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "FOOD" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2004-05-11 | |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2004-05-11 | 323340 |
| EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2003-11-06 | 323340 |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2003-11-06 | |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2003-05-27 | |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2003-02-25 | |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2003-02-21 | |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2003-01-23 | |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2003-01-23 | 323340 |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2003-01-21 | |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-10 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-01-10 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-10-09 | 72152 |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2002-07-10 | |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-06-13 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-06-13 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-12-11 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-12-07 | 78180 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 