Mark For: VERA CRUZ™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 76308891 |
Mark Literal Elements | VERA CRUZ |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2005-12-12 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Lawrence E. Apolzon |
Attorney Docket Number | FASL 0107030 |
Law Office Assigned | L20 |
Employee Name | SAITO, KIM TSUKIYO |
2001-09-05 | Application Filed |
2005-11-17 | Abandon |
2005-12-12 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2005-12-12 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
2005-12-12 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 3333 New Hyde Park Road New Hyde Park, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 11042 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
![]() | 2001-09-05 | |
![]() | 2001-09-05 | |
![]() | 2001-09-05 | |
![]() | 2001-09-05 | |
![]() | 2002-01-17 | |
![]() | 2002-01-18 | |
![]() | 2002-04-15 | |
![]() | 2002-04-15 | |
![]() | 2002-05-16 | |
![]() | 2002-06-25 | |
![]() | 2003-01-09 | |
![]() | 2003-02-26 | |
![]() | 2003-03-06 | |
![]() | 2003-03-24 | |
![]() | 2003-03-24 | |
![]() | 2003-03-24 | |
![]() | 2003-04-15 | |
![]() | 2003-04-15 | |
![]() | 2003-04-16 | |
![]() | 2003-06-30 | |
![]() | 2003-06-30 | |
![]() | 2003-07-11 | |
![]() | 2003-09-28 | |
![]() | 2005-05-14 | |
![]() | 2005-05-17 | |
![]() | 2005-12-12 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: footwear
International Codes: | 25 |
U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0251 | footwear |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-12-12 | |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-12-12 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-05-16 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-05-14 | 72517 |
SUSPENSION CHECKED TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2005-02-02 | 70138 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-07-08 | |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-09-30 | |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-07-14 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-06-30 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-06-30 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-06-26 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-03-24 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-24 | |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-03-06 | |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-01-09 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-10-23 | 72517 |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-06-25 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-04-15 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-04-15 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-01-18 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-11-19 | 78432 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-11-02 | 73699 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.