Mark For: SUPREME COURT™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76252082 |
Mark Literal Elements | SUPREME COURT |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | INTENT TO USE SECTION 2005-03-04 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | PETER F CORLESS |
Attorney Docket Number | 55791 |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOH |
2001-05-04 | Application Filed |
2002-11-26 | Published |
2002-11-26 | Published for Opposition |
2005-03-04 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
2006-02-19 | Abandon |
2006-02-19 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
2006-02-19 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | California Products Corporation |
Address | 150 Dascomb Road Andover, MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES 01810 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | MASSACHUSETTS |
(ABANDONED)
IC 002. US 006 011 016. G & S: ACRYL
IC COLOR COATING FILLER FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE(ABANDONED)
IC 019. US 001 012 033 050. G & S: TENNIS COURT SYNTHET
IC SURFACE
International Codes: | 2 |
U.S. Codes: | 006,011,016 |
International Codes: | 19 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,012,033,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0021 | ACRYLIC COLOR COATING FILLER FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2006-04-25 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2006-04-25 | 46996 |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2005-07-05 | |
SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2005-07-05 | 98765 |
SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2005-07-05 | 98765 |
SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2005-03-25 | 66121 |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2005-02-18 | |
SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2005-02-18 | 66121 |
SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2004-09-28 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-08-17 | |
SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2004-08-17 | |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-08-06 | |
SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2004-02-26 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-02-17 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-02-13 | |
SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2004-02-13 | |
SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-07-28 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-07-17 | |
SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-07-17 | |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-02-18 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-01-27 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-11-26 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-11-20 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-11-06 | |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-09-18 | |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2002-09-05 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-09-05 | |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-04-25 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-02-13 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-08-16 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-12 | 74288 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.