Mark For: X-CALIBER™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76224063 |
Mark Literal Elements | X-CALIBER |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TTAB 2005-05-18 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Louis J. Knobbe |
Attorney Docket Number | MVMDINC.016T |
Law Office Assigned | L50 |
Employee Name | JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE |
2001-03-12 | Application Filed |
2002-07-30 | Published |
2002-07-30 | Published for Opposition |
2005-05-16 | Abandon |
2005-05-16 | Status: Abandoned after an inter partes decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further information, see TTABVUE on the Tr |
2005-05-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2005-05-18 | Location: TTAB |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | Appriva Medical, Inc. |
Address | 777 North Pastoria Avenue Sunnyvale, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94086 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CALIFORNIA |
Application | 2001-03-12 | |
Drawing | 2001-03-12 | |
Duplicate Application | 2001-03-12 | |
Duplicate Drawing | 2001-03-12 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2001-07-16 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2001-07-17 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2001-07-18 | |
Response to Office Action | 2002-01-22 | |
Unclassified-Other | 2002-04-12 | |
Unclassified-Other | 2002-05-30 | |
Change of Address | 2002-08-08 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2002-11-25 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2003-05-12 | |
Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2004-07-19 | |
File Jacket | 2004-12-30 | |
Change of Address | 2005-02-03 | |
Notice of Abandonment | 2005-02-15 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 010. US 026 039 044. G & S: MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, IMPLANTABLE OCCLUSION DEVICES FOR EMBOL
IC AND CARDIO-EMBOL
IC PROTECTION
International Codes: | 10 |
U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0101 | MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, IMPLANTABLE OCCLUSION DEVICES FOR EMBOLIC AND CARDIO-EMBOLIC PROTECTION |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2005-05-16 | 153996 |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2005-05-16 | 153996 |
ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | 2005-05-16 | |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-05-16 | |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | 2005-02-15 | |
ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | 2005-02-15 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-02-03 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-07-19 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-12 | |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2002-12-21 | 153996 |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2002-08-28 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2002-08-08 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-07-30 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-07-10 | |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-05-10 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-01-22 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-07-18 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-07-02 | 76611 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.