SOULWARE

Soulware, Inc.

Application Filed: 2001-01-25

Trademark Application Details

Mark For: SOULWARE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of computer software for use in the collection and organization of personal data. [all]

Status

2022-09-12 UTC

DEAD APPLICATION Refused Dismissed or Invalidated

This trademark application was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office and this application is no longer active.

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	76200773
Mark Literal Elements	SOULWARE
Mark Drawing Type	1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S)
Mark Type	TRADEMARK
Standard Character Claim	No
Register	PRINCIPAL
Current Location	INTENT TO USE SECTION 2006-03-10
Basis	1(b)
Class Status	ACTIVE
Primary US Classes	021: Electrical Apparatus, Machines and Supplies 023: Cutlery, Machinery, Tools and Parts Thereof 026: Measuring and Scientific Appliances 036: Musical Instruments and Supplies 038: Prints and Publications
Primary International Class	009 - Primary Class (Electrical and scientific apparatus) Scientific, nautical, surveying, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision), lifesaving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
Filed Use	No
Current Use	No
Intent To Use	Yes
Filed ITU	Yes
44D Filed	No
44E Current	No
66A Current	No
Current Basis	No
No Basis	No
Attorney Name	DAVID E. STOLL
Attorney Docket Number	13392
Law Office Assigned	L10
Employee Name	CLARK, ROBERT C

Timeline

2001-01-25	Application Filed
2003-12-09	Published
2003-12-09	Published for Opposition
2006-03-10	Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION
2006-09-08	Abandon
2006-09-08	Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume
2006-09-08	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)

Party:	Soulware, Inc.
Address	484 Redwood Rd. Corralitos, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 95076
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DELAWARE

Documents

Application	IMAGE/TIFF	2001-01-25
Drawing	IMAGE/TIFF	2001-01-25
Duplicate Application		2001-01-25
Duplicate Drawing		2001-01-25
XSearch Search Summary		2001-05-14
Suspension Letter		2001-05-17
Unclassified-Other		2003-10-14
Notice of Publication		2003-11-19
Notice of Publication		2003-11-19
Notice of Allowance		2004-02-20
Notice of Allowance		2004-03-02
File Jacket		2004-06-17
Extension of Time to File SOU		2004-09-01
ITU Extension Approval		2004-09-15
Extension of Time to File SOU	APPLICATION/XML,IMAGE/TIFF	2005-03-02
ITU Extension Approval	APPLICATION/XML	2005-03-25
Notice of Abandonment	APPLICATION/XML	2005-11-08
Change of Address		2005-12-08
Notice Of Revive Application		2006-01-06
TEAS Petition to Revive SOU		2006-01-06
ITU Extension Approval		2006-02-03
Extension of Time to File SOU		2006-02-24
ITU Extension Approval		2006-03-16
Notice of Abandonment		2006-11-09

Attorney of Record

DAVID E. STOLL
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
30TH FLOOR
RUSS BUILDING, 235 MONTGOMERY STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104

Good, Services, and Codes

(ABANDONED)
IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Computer software for use in the collection and organization of personal data

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
GS0091	Computer software for use in the collection and organization of personal data

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Proceeding Number
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2006-11-09
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2006-11-09	41853
SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	2006-03-15	64657
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2006-02-24
SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	2006-02-24	64657
TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	2006-01-06
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	2006-01-06	88889
EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	2006-01-06
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	2005-12-08
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2005-11-08
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2005-11-08	48494
SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	2005-10-02	76873
SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	2005-09-02	76873
SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	2005-03-24	76873
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2005-03-02
SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	2005-03-02	76873
SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2004-09-14
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2004-09-01
SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	2004-09-01
CASE FILE IN TICRS	2004-06-18
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2004-03-02
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2003-12-09
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2003-11-19
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2003-09-30
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	2001-05-17
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2001-05-04	59500
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2001-04-27	76081

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
SOULWARE 78787955 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Soulware, Inc. 2006-01-09
SOULWARE 76201877 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Soulware, Inc. 2001-01-25
SOULWARE 76200773 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Soulware, Inc. 2001-01-25
SOULWARE 75900821 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Koenig, Nicholas 2000-01-21

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.