Mark For: THE JCS COLLECTION™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76035667 |
Mark Literal Elements | THE JCS COLLECTION |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK 2005-07-28 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Daniel A. Thomson |
Attorney Docket Number | 0812.0015 |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | DALIER, JOHN DAVID |
2000-04-26 | Application Filed |
2001-07-31 | Published |
2001-07-31 | Published for Opposition |
2004-10-24 | Abandon |
2004-10-24 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
2004-10-24 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2005-07-28 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | Claire's Folly, Inc. |
Address | 7850 Freeway Circle Ste. 200 Middleburg Heights, OHIO UNITED STATES 44130 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | OHIO |
(ABANDONED)
IC 014. US 002 027 028 050. G & S: Jewelry
International Codes: | 14 |
U.S. Codes: | 002,027,028,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
D10000 | "COLLECTION" |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2005-09-28 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2005-09-27 | 48878 |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-05-11 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-11-23 | |
SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2004-10-28 | 76873 |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2004-10-04 | 67832 |
PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2004-06-08 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-06-08 | |
SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2004-04-23 | 76873 |
SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2003-10-31 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-10-23 | |
SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2003-10-23 | |
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-08-08 | |
SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2003-05-29 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-05-21 | |
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2003-05-01 | |
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2003-04-29 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2003-04-23 | |
SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2003-04-23 | |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-03-13 | |
SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2003-01-06 | |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2002-10-22 | |
SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2002-10-22 | |
SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2002-10-22 | |
PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2002-10-03 | |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2002-09-25 | |
PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2002-06-06 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-06-06 | |
SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2002-04-23 | |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2001-10-23 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2001-07-31 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2001-07-18 | |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-02-28 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-10-20 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-09-28 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-22 | 72503 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.