CHOPPER
Olympia Group Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75982980 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Attorney Name | William B. Patterson |
| Attorney Docket Number | OLYM/0010 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE |
Timeline
| 1997-10-28 | Date of First Use |
| 1999-11-24 | Application Filed |
| 2003-01-28 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-05-18 | Abandon |
| 2004-07-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2004-07-13 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Olympia Group Inc. |
| Address | 505 South Seventh Avenue City of Industry CA 91746 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0071 | Machine parts, namely cut-off wheels; abrasives wheels |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-04-07 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-04-26 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-10-30 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-01-08 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-04-05 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-10-09 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2002-02-04 | 7 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2002-08-12 | 8 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2002-08-15 | 9 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-08-05 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2002-08-05 | 11 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2002-10-02 | 12 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2002-11-07 | 13 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2002-11-07 | 14 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-11-25 | 15 CNSA P: |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2002-11-30 | 16 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-01-08 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-01-28 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-04-22 | 19 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2003-10-22 | 20 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2003-10-22 | 21 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-10-29 | 22 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-11-09 | 23 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-11-10 | 24 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-11-17 | 25 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2004-07-09 | 26 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 