NUALA
PUMA AG Rudolf Dassler Sport
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75982870 |
| Registration Number | 2801678 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Lynn A. Sullivan |
| Attorney Name | Lynn A. Sullivan |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | SALEMI, DOMINICK J |
Timeline
| 2000-10-23 | Application Filed |
| 2003-10-14 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-01-06 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-06-07 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2010-08-14 | Cancelled |
| 2010-08-14 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  PUMA AG Rudolf Dassler Sport |
| Address | Wuerzburger Str. 13 D-91074 Herzogenau DE |
| Legal Entity Type | Joint Stock Company |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| International Codes: | 14 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,027,028,050 |
| International Codes: | 18 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,002,003,022,041 |
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Perfumery, bath oils, essential oils, incense and aromatherapy oils, cosmetics, antibacterial skin soaps, anti-bacterial soap, deodorant soap, hand soaps, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, shaving soap, skin soap, toilet soap, waterless soap, hair care products, namely hair shampoo, shampoo-conditioners, hair gels, hair lotions, pomades |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-03-29 | 1 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-09-28 | 2 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-09-28 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-11-15 | 4 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-01-30 | 5 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-02-19 | 6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-05-14 | 7 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-06-25 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2002-06-25 | 9 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2002-09-06 | 10 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PETITION TO DIRECTOR - GRANTED | 2002-09-17 | 11 PCGR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-09-24 | 12 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-10-14 | 13 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-01-06 | 14 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-04-14 | 15 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-03-22 | 16 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-03-22 | 17 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-06-07 | 18 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2010-08-14 | 19 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 