YANDEX
Yandex, Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75937082 |
| Registration Number | 2760594 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | WAHLBERG, STACY B |
Timeline
| 1997-09-23 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-03-06 | Application Filed |
| 2003-06-17 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-09-09 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-07-03 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2010-04-17 | Cancelled |
| 2010-04-17 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  YANDEX, LTD. |
| Address | 1 bldg. 21, Samokatnaya Street 111033 Moscow RU |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | RU |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Computer software for providing multiple user access to a global computer network; and computer software for use in creating and designing web sites |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-08-17 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-08-21 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-11-08 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2002-02-07 | 4 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2002-03-01 | 5 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2002-09-03 | 6 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-10-09 | 7 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-03-25 | 8 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-25 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-04-15 | 10 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-05-28 | 11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-06-17 | 12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-09-09 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2004-09-09 | 14 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2006-05-10 | 15 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-05-31 | 16 CORV P: |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2006-11-02 | 17 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2006-11-02 | 18 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-07-03 | 19 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2008-11-12 | 20 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2008-11-26 | 21 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2010-04-17 | 22 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2016-10-12 | 23 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 