ISLAND
adp Gauselmann GmbH
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75858618 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Horst M. Kasper |
| Attorney Name | Horst M. Kasper |
| Attorney Docket Number | adp818SP |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | CHOSID, ROBIN S |
Timeline
| 1999-11-23 | Application Filed |
| 2005-08-30 | Abandon |
| 2005-08-30 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2005-10-25 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  adp Gauselmann GmbH |
| Address | Merkur-Allee 1-15 32339 Espelkamp DE |
| Legal Entity Type | Company |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | COIN-OPERATED CASINO, ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMBLING APPARATUSES, AND DEVICES, NAMELY, GAME MACHINES, VIDEO GAME MACHINES, SLOT MACHINES, VIDEO SLOT MACHINES, CASINO VIDEO SLOT MACHINES, ACCOUNTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ELECTRONIC CARDS, POKER MACHINES, ELECTRONIC BACKGAMMON AND PARTS THEREOF |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-05-04 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-05-19 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-06-01 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-06-19 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-12-19 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2001-05-01 | 6 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2002-01-29 | 7 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2002-01-29 | 8 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-07-11 | 9 CNSL S: |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-12-24 | 10 CNSL S: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-03-23 | 11 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-03-23 | 12 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-05-13 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-05-13 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2004-08-02 | 15 RECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-09-02 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2004-12-09 | 17 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2005-02-02 | 18 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 2005-02-03 | 19 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2005-05-25 | 20 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2005-08-30 | 21 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-10-25 | 22 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2005-08-30 | 23 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2005-10-25 | 24 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 