FOODSMART

GemStone Systems, Inc.

Application Filed: 1999-10-28

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	75833965
Mark Drawing Code	1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s)
Attorney Name	Daniel A. Blaufus
Law Office Assigned	L20
Employee Name	RADEMACHER, APRIL LEUD

Timeline

1999-10-28	Application Filed
2002-08-27	Published for Opposition
2003-11-20	Abandon
2003-11-20	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2004-01-08	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	GemStone Systems, Inc.
Address	20575 NW von Neumann Drive Beaverton OR 97006
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	OR

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

DANIEL A. BLAUFUS
TONKON TORP LLP
1600 PIONEER TOWER
888 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-2099

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
GS0091	COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE INTERFACES, NAMELY RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OR RDBMS

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2000-03-13	1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	2000-04-06	2 CNRT F:First Action
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2000-09-21	3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2001-02-10	4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	2001-02-15	5 CNRT F:First Action
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2001-08-14	6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	2001-11-07	7 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2002-03-21	8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2002-03-31	9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2002-06-13	10 CNSA P:
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2002-08-07	11 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2002-08-27	12 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2002-11-19	13 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	2003-05-19	14 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2003-05-19	15 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2003-06-13	16 EX1G S:
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2004-01-06	17 ABN6 S:

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
FOODSMART 90095615 not registered Live/Pending	Zipongo, Inc. 2020-08-05
FOODSMART 87572762 5568416 Live/Registered	Fuelco Distributors, LLC 2017-08-17
FOODSMART 86417650 4792015 Live/Registered	True Innovation Company 2014-10-08
FOODSMART 77857457 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Iowa Soybean Association 2009-10-26
FOODSMART 75833965 not registered Dead/Abandoned	GemStone Systems, Inc. 1999-10-28
FOODSMART 75796356 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Kiser, Anthony C. M. 1999-09-10
FOODSMART 74704791 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Kiser, Anthony C. M. 1995-07-24

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.