THICK

3DO Company, The

Application Filed: 1999-09-30

Trademark Application Details

Status

606

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	75810620
Mark Drawing Code	1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s)
Attorney Name	John P. Bartholomay
Attorney Docket Number	TM 1191
Law Office Assigned	L30
Employee Name	STIGLITZ, SUSAN R

Timeline

1999-09-30	Application Filed
2000-08-08	Published for Opposition
2001-11-01	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2002-06-28	Abandon
2003-01-16	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	3DO Company, The
Address	600 Galveston Drive Redwood City CA 94063
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	CA

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

JOHN P BARTHOLOMAY
GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP
3340 HILLVIEW AVE
PALO ALTO CA 94304

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	28
U.S. Codes:	022,023,038,050

Type Code	Type
GS0281	Toys - Namely, action figures and accessories therefore, action skill games, arcade games, card games, cases for action figures, collectible toy figures, board games and equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, positional toy figures, promotional game materials, toy vehicles, toy vehicles with transforming parts, toy watches, toy weapons, coin-operated video games, handheld unit for playing electronic games; and coin and non-coin operated pinball machines

Type Code

Type

GS0281

Toys - Namely, action figures and accessories therefore, action skill games, arcade games, card games, cases for action figures, collectible toy figures, board games and equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, positional toy figures, promotional game materials, toy vehicles, toy vehicles with transforming parts, toy watches, toy weapons, coin-operated video games, handheld unit for playing electronic games; and coin and non-coin operated pinball machines

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2000-02-29	1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2000-03-07	2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	2000-03-20	3 CNRT F:First Action
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2000-05-17	4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2000-06-08	5 CNSA P:
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2000-07-07	6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2000-08-08	7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	2000-10-31	8 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence
EXTENSION 1 FILED	2001-04-26	9 EXT1 S:
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	2001-05-22	10 EX1G S:
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	2002-06-28	11 ABN6 S:

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
THICK 88044115 not registered Live/Pending	Duke Cannon Supply Company, LLC 2018-07-19
THICK 87794582 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Thick 2018-02-12
THICK 87772659 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Thick 2018-01-26
THICK 75810620 not registered Dead/Abandoned	3DO Company, The 1999-09-30
THICK 75467823 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Newman, Marc A. 1998-04-14

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.