EASY STREET
Aristocrat Technologie, Inc.
Application Filed: 1999-09-15
Trademark Application Details
CANCELLED - SECTION 8
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75800867 |
| Registration Number | 3257381 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Kieran Power |
| Attorney Name | Keith D. Moore |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | EISINGER, REBECCA MILE |
Timeline
| 1999-09-14 | Date of First Use |
| 1999-09-15 | Application Filed |
| 2007-04-17 | Published for Opposition |
| 2007-07-03 | Trademark Registered |
| 2009-04-06 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2014-02-07 | Cancelled |
| 2014-02-07 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIE, INC. |
| Address | 7230 AMIGO STREET LEGAL DEPT LAS VEGAS NV 89119 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NV |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | gaming devices, namely, gaming machines and computer game software therefore |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-02-02 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2000-02-22 | 2 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-04-09 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-02-20 | 4 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-03-26 | 5 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-09-08 | 6 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2004-10-27 | 7 RCCK S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-02-03 | 8 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2005-08-10 | 9 RCCK S: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-09-24 | 10 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-09-26 | 11 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-03-26 | 12 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-03-26 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-04-25 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-05-30 | 15 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-05-31 | 16 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-06-09 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-06-09 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-07-13 | 19 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2006-10-03 | 20 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-10-24 | 21 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-10-24 | 22 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-11-30 | 23 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-12-13 | 24 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-12-13 | 25 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-01-17 | 26 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-01-26 | 27 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-03-01 | 28 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-03-01 | 29 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-03-28 | 30 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-04-17 | 31 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-07-03 | 32 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-07-03 | 33 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2008-07-09 | 34 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2009-03-02 | 35 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2009-04-06 | 36 CORV P: |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2010-06-18 | 37 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2010-06-18 | 38 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2010-06-23 | 39 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2012-09-06 | 40 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2012-09-06 | 41 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2013-01-24 | 42 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2013-01-24 | 43 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2014-02-07 | 44 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2016-02-18 | 45 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2016-02-18 | 46 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 